The impact of foreign direct investment on urban PM2.5 pollution in China

被引:122
作者
Cheng, Zhonghua [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Lianshui [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Jun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, China Inst Mfg Dev, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Reading Acad, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Foreign direct investment; PM2.5; Spatial autocorrelation; Spatial spillover effect; Dynamic spatial panel; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; CO2; EMISSIONS; PANEL; FDI;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110532
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The hypothesis of "Pollution Heaven" or "Pollution Halo" has, for some time, been one of the central issues in environmental economics. There is a controversy in the conclusions with regards to China, it thus needs further empirical testing. Based on 2003 to 2016 statistical data on 285 Chinese cities, this paper uses a dynamic spatial panel model to empirically analyze the impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) on PM2.5 pollution. The results demonstrate that urban PM2.5 pollution shows both significant global spatial autocorrelation and local spatial agglomeration effects. Overall, FDI significantly aggravates China's urban PM2.5 pollution, thus confirming the "Pollution Heaven" hypothesis. This effect, however, depends on the stage of urban economic development. Although FDI has no significant effect on urban PM2.5 pollution in the initial stage of industrialization, it does aggravate urban PM2.5 pollution in the midterm stage. In the later period of industrialization, FDI actually improves urban PM2.5 pollution, but the effect of this improvement is relatively weak. Furthermore, PM2.5 pollution shows significant spatial spillover and dynamic effects. It follows that both joint prevention and control and continuous efforts must be made to control PM2.5 pollution.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Investigating the causality links between environmental quality, foreign direct investment and economic growth in MENA countries [J].
Abdouli, Mohamed ;
Hammami, Sami .
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2017, 26 (02) :264-278
[2]  
ACHARYYA JOYSRI, 2009, Journal of Economic Development, V34, P43
[3]  
Ajide B., 2010, ENV RES J, V4, P291, DOI DOI 10.3923/ERJ.2010.291.297
[4]   Investigating the validity of pollution haven hypothesis in the gulf cooperation council (GCC) countries [J].
Al-mulali, Usama ;
Tang, Chor Foon .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 60 :813-819
[5]  
Alshahrani A, 2017, 2017 8TH IEEE ANNUAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, ELECTRONICS AND MOBILE COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (IEMCON), P121, DOI 10.1109/IEMCON.2017.8117166
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Journal of International Development: The Journal of the Development Studies Association, DOI DOI 10.1002/JID.1196
[7]   LOCAL INDICATORS OF SPATIAL ASSOCIATION - LISA [J].
ANSELIN, L .
GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS, 1995, 27 (02) :93-115
[8]   Environmental Kuznets curves: New evidence on both panel and country-level CO2 emissions [J].
Apergis, Nicholas .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 54 :263-271
[9]  
Asghari M., 2013, INT J SCI RES ENV SC, V1, P92, DOI DOI 10.12983/IJSRES-2013-P092-100
[10]   Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve and pollution haven hypotheses: MIKTA sample [J].
Bakirtas, Ibrahim ;
Cetin, Mumin Atalay .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2017, 24 (22) :18273-18283