Perioperative outcomes of the patients treated using laparoscopic cholecystectomy after emergent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for bile duct stones: Does timing matter?

被引:10
|
作者
Senocak, Rahman [1 ]
Celik, Suleyman Utku [1 ]
Kaymak, Sahin [1 ]
Hancerliogullari, Oguz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Gen Surg, Gulhane Training & Res Hosp, Ankara, Turkey
来源
ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY | 2020年 / 26卷 / 03期
关键词
Choledocholithiasis; cholelithiasis; complication; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; SPHINCTEROTOMY; GALLBLADDER; CHOLELITHIASIS; RISK; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; MANAGEMENT; CONVERSION;
D O I
10.14744/tjtes.2020.94401
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after emergent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for suspected choledocholithiasis. Although certain data suggest that an early interval or single-stage treatment by LC, together with laparoscopic bile duct exploration, has more favorable outcomes, delayed LC is most often preferred as the standard treatment of patients with gallstones and choledocholithiasis following ERCP due to lack of experience, necessary instrumentation, or organizational restrictions. This study aims to compare the effects of different time intervals between ERCP and LC on perioperative outcomes. METHODS: In this paper, preoperative and postoperative data from consecutive patients who were treated for common bile duct stones with emergent ERCP and then underwent LC were reviewed retrospectively. To evaluate the impacts of different time intervals on outcomes, patients were classified into three groups according to the duration from the last ERCP to LC: within two weeks (Group 1), between 2-6 weeks (Group 2), and over six weeks (Group 3). RESULTS: This study involved an analysis of 67 patients with a mean age of 52.8 years. Overall conversion rate was 20.0% in Group 1, 25.0% in Group 2, and 13.6% in Group 3 ( p=0.646). The rate of conversion to open surgery was 25.0% in male patients and 14.2% in females. In addition, no significant difference was found between the groups concerning gender, comorbidities, laboratory and gall-bladder features, operation time, and length of the hospital stay. The perioperative complication rate was found to be 17.9%; however, there was no significant difference between the three groups. CONCLUSION: Our results support that LC after ERCP is more complex and has higher conversion rates than LC for uncomplicated cholelithiasis. Although no significant effect of different time intervals between ERCP and LC on perioperative outcomes was demonstrated in patients with common bile duct stones concomitant with cholelithiasis, the 2-6 weeks after ERCP is a critical period for conversion to open surgery. It is recommended that LC after ERCP should be performed in the early period, considering that serious complications may occur in the late period and recurrent biliary attacks may occur.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 404
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal Timing for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Systematic Review
    Friis, C.
    Rothman, J. P.
    Burcharth, J.
    Rosenberg, J.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 107 (02) : 99 - 106
  • [2] Is early laparoscopic cholecystectomy after clearance of common bile duct stones by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography superior?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wu, Kun
    Xiao, Linking
    Xiang, Jifeng
    Huan, Lu
    Xie, Wei
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (45) : E31365
  • [3] Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in cholelithiasis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Poprom, Napaphat
    Suragul, Wikran
    Muangkaew, Paramin
    Vassanasiri, Watoo
    Rungsakulkij, Narongsak
    Mingphruedhi, Somkit
    Tangtawee, Pongsatorn
    ANNALS OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY, 2023, 27 (01) : 20 - 27
  • [4] Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with less risk of complications after the removal of common bile duct stones by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
    Aziret, Mehmet
    Karaman, Kerem
    Ercan, Metin
    Vargol, Erdem
    Toka, Bilal
    Arslan, Yusuf
    Oter, Volkan
    Bostanci, Erdal Birol
    Parlak, Erkan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 30 (04): : 336 - 344
  • [5] Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for elderly patients with common bile duct stones and gallbladder stones
    Wu, Po-Hsuan
    Yu, Min -Wei
    Chuang, Shih-Chang
    Wang, Shen-Nien
    Kuo, Kung-Kai
    Chang, Wen-Tsan
    Chuang, Shu-Hung
    Su, Wen-Lung
    Huang, Jian-Wei
    Chen, Ling-An
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2024, 28 (05) : 719 - 724
  • [6] Comparison of intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treating gallstones and common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lei, Caining
    Lu, Tingting
    Yang, Wenwen
    Yang, Man
    Tian, Hongwei
    Song, Shaoming
    Gong, Shiyi
    Yang, Jia
    Jiang, Wenjie
    Yang, Kehu
    Guo, Tiankang
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (11): : 5918 - 5935
  • [7] Synchronous Approach versus the Sequential Approach in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Gallstones and Suspected Common Bile Duct Stones
    Boonmee, Chaloemphon
    Summart, Ueamporn
    Arayajarernwong, Niramon
    Pareesri, Wattana
    Srigulawong, Taungprart
    Boonharn, Somsak
    Naowarungsri, Siphon
    Watayajinda, Wipapun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2019, 13 (02)
  • [8] Meta-analysis of the timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis
    Li, Zhan
    Xu, Dong
    Yu, Hao
    Jiang, Honglei
    Jin, Junzhe
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 35 (06) : 619 - 628
  • [9] Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus laparoscopic exploration for common bile duct stones in post-cholecystectomy patients: a retrospective study
    Wang, Xiaohong
    Dai, Chenguang
    Jiang, Zhonghua
    Zhao, Lili
    Wang, Min
    Ma, Limei
    Tan, Xueming
    Liu, Li
    Wang, Xiang
    Fan, Zhining
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (47) : 82114 - 82122
  • [10] Comparison of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration with Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Common Bile Duct Stones After Cholecystectomy
    Li, Qinghua
    Chen, Lu
    Liu, Shuanghai
    Chen, Dawei
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 32 (09): : 992 - 998