The evaluation of reflective learning from the nursing student's point of view: A mixed method approach

被引:22
作者
Fernandez-Pena, Rosario [1 ]
Fuentes-Pumarola, Concepcio [2 ]
Carme Malagon-Aguilera, M. [2 ]
Bonmati-Tomas, Anna [2 ]
Bosch-Farre, Cristina [2 ]
Ballester-Ferrando, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cantabria, Sch Nursing, Avda Valdecilla S-N, Santander 39008, Spain
[2] Univ Girona, Fac Nursing, Emili Grahit 77, Girona 17003, Spain
关键词
Reflective learning; Reflective journal; Reflective writing; Nursing students; Nursing education; PERCEPTIONS; JOURNALS; PROMOTION; EDUCATION; DESIGN; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2016.05.005
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Adapting university programmes to European Higher Education Area criteria has required substantial changes in curricula and teaching methodologies. Reflective learning (RL) has attracted growing interest and occupies an important place in the scientific literature on theoretical and methodological aspects of university instruction. However, fewer studies have focused on evaluating the RL methodology from the point of view of nursing students. Objectives: To assess nursing students' perceptions of the usefulness and challenges of RL methodology. Design: Mixed method design, using a cross-sectional questionnaire and focus group discussion. Methods: The research was conducted via self-reported reflective learning questionnaire complemented by focus group discussion. Results: Students provided a positive overall evaluation of RL, highlighting the method's capacity to help them better understand themselves, engage in self-reflection about the learning process, optimize their strengths and discover additional training needs, along with searching for continuous improvement. Nonetheless, RL does not help them as much to plan their learning or identify areas of weakness or needed improvement in knowledge, skills and attitudes. Among the difficulties or challenges, students reported low motivation and lack of familiarity with this type of learning, along with concerns about the privacy of their reflective journals and about the grading criteria. Conclusions: In general, students evaluated RL positively. The results suggest areas of needed improvement related to unfamiliarity with the methodology, ethical aspects of developing a reflective journal and the need for clear evaluation criteria. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 65
页数:7
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Al-karasneh S.M., 2014, EUR J EDUC, V49, P395, DOI DOI 10.1111/EJED.12084
[2]   A critical evaluation of the usefulness of a coding scheme to categorise levels of reflective thinking [J].
Bell, Amani ;
Kelton, Jill ;
McDonagh, Nadia ;
Mladenovic, Rosina ;
Morrison, Kellie .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 36 (07) :797-815
[3]   Engaged pedagogy: a study of the use of reflective journals in accounting education [J].
Bisman, Jayne .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 36 (03) :315-330
[4]  
Blanco R., 2005, MET ENFERMERIA, V8, P60
[5]  
Bloor M., 2001, FOCUS GROUPS SOCIAL, DOI [DOI 10.4135/9781849209175, 10.4135/9781849209175]
[6]  
Boud D., 2001, Promoting journal writing in adult education. New directions in adult and continuing education No. 90, P9, DOI [DOI 10.1002/ACE.16, https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.16]
[7]  
Bulman C., 2008, Reflective practice in nursing, P1
[8]   The evaluation of an approach to reflective learning in the undergraduate dental curriculum [J].
Bush, H. ;
Bissell, V. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2008, 12 (02) :103-110
[9]   The use of reflective journals in the promotion of reflection and learning in post-registration nursing students [J].
Chirema, Kathleen D. .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2007, 27 (03) :192-202
[10]  
Colomer J, 2012, INTED PROC, P256