Quiet PROPELLER MRI Techniques Match the Quality of Conventional PROPELLER Brain Imaging Techniques

被引:22
作者
Corcuera-Solano, I. [1 ]
Doshi, A. [1 ]
Pawha, P. S. [1 ]
Gui, D. [2 ]
Gaddipati, A. [2 ]
Tanenbaum, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Icahn Sch Med, Neuroradiol Sect, Dept Radiol,Radiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI USA
关键词
ACOUSTIC NOISE-REDUCTION; COCHLEAR FUNCTION; GRADIENT PULSES; EXPOSURE; COILS;
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A4235
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Switching of magnetic field gradients is the primary source of acoustic noise in MR imaging. Sound pressure levels can run as high as 120 dB, capable of producing physical discomfort and at least temporary hearing loss, mandating hearing protection. New technology has made quieter techniques feasible, which range from as low as 80 dB to nearly silent. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality of new commercially available quiet T2 and quiet FLAIR fast spin-echo PROPELLER acquisitions in comparison with equivalent conventional PROPELLER techniques in current day-to-day practice in imaging of the brain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients were prospectively scanned with quiet T2 and quiet T2 FLAIR PROPELLER, in addition to spatial resolution-matched conventional T2 and T2 FLAIR PROPELLER imaging sequences on a clinical 1.5T MR imaging scanner. Measurement of sound pressure levels and qualitative evaluation of relative image quality was performed. RESULTS: Quiet T2 and quiet T2 FLAIR were comparable in image quality with conventional acquisitions, with sound levels of approximately 75 dB, a reduction in average sound pressure levels of up to 28.5 dB, with no significant trade-offs aside from longer scan times. CONCLUSIONS: Quiet FSE provides equivalent image quality at comfortable sound pressure levels at the cost of slightly longer scan times. The significant reduction in potentially injurious noise is particularly important in vulnerable populations such as children, the elderly, and the debilitated. Quiet techniques should be considered in these special situations for routine use in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1124 / 1127
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Acoustic noise reduction in MRI using Silent Scan: an initial experience [J].
Alibek, Sedat ;
Vogel, Mika ;
Sun, Wei ;
Winkler, David ;
Baker, Christopher A. ;
Burke, Michael ;
Gloger, Hubertus .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 20 (04) :360-363
[2]   QUIET TRANSVERSE GRADIENT COILS - LORENTZ FORCE BALANCED DESIGNS USING GEOMETRICAL SIMILITUDE [J].
BOWTELL, RW ;
MANSFIELD, P .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 34 (03) :494-497
[3]   POTENTIAL HEARING-LOSS RESULTING FROM MR IMAGING [J].
BRUMMETT, RE ;
TALBOT, JM ;
CHARUHAS, P .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 169 (02) :539-540
[4]   A new silent magnetic resonance imaging using a rotating DC gradient [J].
Cho, ZH ;
Chung, ST ;
Chung, JY ;
Park, SH ;
Kim, JS ;
Moon, CH ;
Hong, IK .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1998, 39 (02) :317-321
[5]   Characterization and prediction of gradient acoustic noise in MR imagers [J].
Hedeen, RA ;
Edelstein, WA .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1997, 37 (01) :7-10
[6]   Sequence-Based Acoustic Noise Reduction of Clinical MRI Scans [J].
Heismann, Bjoern ;
Ott, Martin ;
Grodzki, David .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2015, 73 (03) :1104-1109
[7]  
Hennel F, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V42, P6, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199907)42:1<6::AID-MRM2>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-D
[9]   ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS OF GRADIENT-COIL NOISE IN MR IMAGING [J].
HURWITZ, R ;
LANE, SR ;
BELL, RA ;
BRANTZAWADZKI, MN .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 173 (02) :545-548
[10]   Quiet T1-Weighted Imaging Using PETRA: Initial Clinical Evaluation in Intracranial Tumor Patients [J].
Ida, Masahiro ;
Wakayama, Toshiki ;
Nielsen, Matthew L. ;
Abe, Takayuki ;
Grodzki, David M. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 41 (02) :447-453