Robustness and state-space structure of Boolean gene regulatory models

被引:30
|
作者
Willadsen, Kai [1 ,2 ]
Wiles, Janet [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Informat Technol & Elect Engn, ARC Ctr Complex Syst, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Frankfurt Inst Adv Studies, D-60438 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
gene regulatory network; Boolean model; robustness;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.09.004
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Robustness to perturbation is an important characteristic of genetic regulatory systems, but the relationship between robustness and model dynamics has not been clearly quantified. We propose a method for quantifying both robustness and dynamics in terms of state-space Structures, for Boolean models of genetic regulatory systems. By investigating existing models of the Drosophila melanogaster segment polarity network and the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell-cycle network, we show that the structure of attractor basins can yield insight into the underlying decision making required of the system, and also the way in which the system maximises its robustness. In particular, gene networks implementing decisions based on a few genes have simple state-space structures, and their attractors are robust by virtue of their simplicity. Gene networks with decisions that involve many interacting genes have correspondingly more complicated state-space Structures, and robustness cannot be achieved through the structure of the attractor basins, but is achieved by larger attractor basins that dominate the state space. These different types of robustness are demonstrated by the two models: the D. melanogaster segment polarity network is robust due to simple attractor basins that implement decisions based on spatial signals; the S. cerevisiae cell-cycle network has a complicated state-space structure, and is robust only due to a giant attractor basin that dominates the state space. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 765
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DREISS: Using State-Space Models to Infer the Dynamics of Gene Expression Driven by External and Internal Regulatory Networks
    Wang, Daifeng
    He, Fei
    Maslov, Sergei
    Gerstein, Mark
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 12 (10)
  • [32] Robustness Analysis of a Boolean Model of Gene Regulatory Network with Memory
    Graudenzi, A.
    Serra, R.
    Villani, M.
    Colacci, A.
    Kauffman, S. A.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 18 (04) : 559 - 577
  • [33] RESULTS ON THE STABILITY ROBUSTNESS OF SYSTEMS WITH STATE-SPACE PERTURBATIONS
    GENESIO, R
    TESI, A
    SYSTEMS & CONTROL LETTERS, 1988, 11 (01) : 39 - 46
  • [34] Robustness of quadratic optimal state-space control with observers
    Pohlmeier, J
    ROBUST CONTROL DESIGN (ROCODN'97): A PROCEEDINGS VOLUME FROM THE IFAC SYMPOSIUM, 1997, : 177 - 182
  • [35] STRUCTURED STATE-SPACE ROBUSTNESS WITH CONNECTION TO EIGENSTRUCTURE ASSIGNMENT
    SOBEL, KM
    BANDA, SS
    YEH, HH
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1989 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 1989, : 966 - 973
  • [36] Minimum phase robustness for uncertain state-space systems
    Chen, SJ
    Lin, JL
    Chan, KC
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 2002, 33 (15) : 1179 - 1186
  • [37] Finding module-based gene networks with state-space models
    Yamaguchi, Rui
    Yoshida, Ryo
    Imoto, Seiya
    Higuchi, Tomoyuki
    Miyano, Satoru
    IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2007, 24 (01) : 37 - 46
  • [38] Granger causality for state-space models
    Barnett, Lionel
    Seth, Anil K.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2015, 91 (04):
  • [39] ON GIBBS SAMPLING FOR STATE-SPACE MODELS
    CARTER, CK
    KOHN, R
    BIOMETRIKA, 1994, 81 (03) : 541 - 553
  • [40] State-space models for optical imaging
    Myers, Kary L.
    Brockwell, Anthony E.
    Eddy, William F.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (21) : 3862 - 3874