Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, and Environmental Consequences

被引:2
作者
Qirjo, Dhimitri [1 ]
Pascalau, Razvan [2 ]
Christopherson, Robert [3 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Coll Plattsburgh, Dept Econ & Finance, 329 Sable Hall,101 Broad St, Plattsburgh, NY 12901 USA
[2] SUNY Coll Plattsburgh, Dept Econ & Finance, 325 Sable Hall,101 Broad St, Plattsburgh, NY 12901 USA
[3] SUNY Coll Plattsburgh, Dept Econ & Finance, 203 Sable Hall,101 Broad St, Plattsburgh, NY 12901 USA
关键词
Free Trade; Environmental Economics; TTIP; Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; POLLUTION; POLICY; AGREEMENTS; SUBSIDIES; IMPACT; FIRM;
D O I
10.11130/jei.2021.36.4.549
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We empirically investigate the effect of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership on the per capita emissions of eight air pollutants and municipal waste. By introducing the same explanatory variables and applying the same empirical strategy and methodologies as in Qirjo and Pascalau (2019), we provide robust evidence suggesting that the implementation of the partnership could be beneficial to the environment because it may reduce per capita emissions of CH4, hydrofluorocarbons/ perfluorinated chemicals/SF6, N2O, NH3, and SF6 for a typical partnership member. This result is based on statistically significant evidence showing that, on average, the pollution haven motive based on national per capita income variations is dominated by the factor endowment argument based on the Heckscher-Ohlin trade theory and the pollution haven motive originating from an inverse measurement of national population density differences. However, we also report statistically significant evidence that the implementation of the partnership could denigrate the environment by increasing per capita emissions of SO2 and municipal waste.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 606
页数:58
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Abrego Lisandro., 2001, REV INT ECON, V9, P414, DOI [DOI 10.1111/1467-9396.00289, 10.1111/1467-9396.00289]
[2]   Anticipated international environmental agreements [J].
Acikgoz, Omer T. ;
Benchekroun, Hassan .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 92 :306-336
[3]   Is free trade good for the environment? [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :877-908
[4]   STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY AND INTERNATIONAL-TRADE [J].
BARRETT, S .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1994, 54 (03) :325-338
[5]   Intra-industry trade in intermediate products, pollution and. internationally increasing returns [J].
Benarroch, Michael ;
Weder, Rolf .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 52 (03) :675-689
[6]  
Benchekroun H, 2011, BE J ECON ANAL POLI, V11
[7]   Environmental standards as strategic outcomes: A simple model [J].
Bhattacharya, Rabindra N. ;
Pal, Rupayan .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (03) :408-420
[8]  
Bommer R., 1999, European journal of political economy, V15, P639, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0176-2680(99)00037-3
[9]   EXPORT SUBSIDIES AND INTERNATIONAL MARKET SHARE RIVALRY [J].
BRANDER, JA ;
SPENCER, BJ .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1985, 18 (1-2) :83-100
[10]   Trade liberalization, environmental policy, and welfare [J].
Burguet, R ;
Sempere, J .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 46 (01) :25-37