Estimating menstrual blood loss in women with normal and excessive menstrual fluid volume

被引:85
作者
Fraser, IS [1 ]
Warner, P
Marantos, PA
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Family Planning NSW, Sydney Ctr Reprod Hlth Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Med Stat Unit, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Sydney, Dept Resp Med, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01581-2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between total fluid volume at menstruation and the volume of blood loss, and to assess the feasibility of using total fluid volume to estimate menstrual blood loss. METHODS: Fifty-three women were studied over two menstrual periods each. Hemoglobin in menstrual pads and tampons was measured using the alkaline hematin technique; total menstrual fluid volume was simultaneously measured using a weighing technique and meticulous care to avoid evaporation. RESULTS: Despite period-to-period change in measured total menstrual fluid and menstrual blood loss volumes, there was a significant correlation between total fluid volume and blood loss (r=.93, P<.001). Blood comprised 48% of total menstrual flow for women with moderately heavy blood loss (>60 mL) and 50% for women with excessive blood loss (>100 mL). Regression estimation of blood loss from total fluid volume was reasonably accurate. For clinical purposes, estimated blood volumes correctly classified 98% of periods in terms of actual blood loss as normal (<60 mL blood), moderately heavy (60-100 mL), or excessive (>100 mL). CONCLUSION: If total fluid volume is measured carefully, the estimate of actual blood loss is sufficiently accurate for clinical purposes. This simple technique has considerable clinical potential, and inexpensive commercial packs for this purpose could easily be developed. (Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:806-14. (C) 2001 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists).
引用
收藏
页码:806 / 814
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins--Gynecology, 2000, Obstet Gynecol, V95, P1
[2]   Guidelines in gynaecology: evaluation in menorrhagia and in urinary incontinence [J].
Chadha, Y ;
Mollison, J ;
Howie, F ;
Grimshaw, J ;
Hall, M ;
Russell, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2000, 107 (04) :535-543
[3]   RELATION BETWEEN MEASURED MENSTRUAL BLOOD-LOSS AND PATIENTS SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF LOSS, DURATION OF BLEEDING, NUMBER OF SANITARY TOWELS USED, UTERINE WEIGHT AND ENDOMETRIAL SURFACE-AREA [J].
CHIMBIRA, TH ;
ANDERSON, ABM ;
TURNBULL, AC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1980, 87 (07) :603-609
[4]  
EBERT R, 1956, SCHUEZ MED WOCHENSCH, V35, P999
[5]   A PRELIMINARY-STUDY OF FACTORS INFLUENCING PERCEPTION OF MENSTRUAL BLOOD-LOSS VOLUME [J].
FRASER, IS ;
MCCARRON, G ;
MARKHAM, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1984, 149 (07) :788-793
[6]  
FRASER IS, 1981, OBSTET GYNECOL, V58, P543
[7]  
FRASER IS, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V65, P194
[8]   A new method for measuring menstrual blood loss and its use in screening women before endometrial ablation [J].
Gannon, MJ ;
Day, P ;
Hammadieh, N ;
Johnson, N .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (10) :1029-1033
[9]  
Grant JM, 2000, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V107, pVII
[10]   DETERMINATION OF MENSTRUAL BLOOD LOSS [J].
HALLBERG, L ;
NILSSON, L .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1964, 16 (02) :244-&