Urinary complications of one-stitch ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation

被引:5
作者
Bardonnaud, N. [1 ]
Pillot, P. [1 ]
Guichard, G. [1 ]
Lillaz, J. [1 ,2 ]
Delorme, G. [1 ,2 ]
Nguyen-Huu, Y. [1 ]
Chabannes, E. [1 ]
Bernardini, S. [1 ]
Bittard, H. [1 ,2 ]
Kleinclauss, F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CHU Besancon, Hop St Jacques, Serv Urol & Transplantat Renale, F-25030 Besancon, France
[2] Univ Franche Comte, F-25030 Besancon, France
[3] Unite Inserm U645, IFR 133, F-25030 Besancon, France
来源
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE | 2012年 / 22卷 / 01期
关键词
Renal transplantation; Ureteroneocystostomy; One-stitch" technique; Urinary complications; URETEROVESICAL REIMPLANTATION TECHNIQUES; UROLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS; LICH-GREGOIR; URETERAL COMPLICATIONS; COMPARING TAGUCHI; RISK-FACTORS; IMPLANTATION; ANASTOMOSIS; SURVIVAL; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.purol.2011.08.040
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose. - To assess urinary complications related to the "one-stitch" technique extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation, and evaluate the impact of such complications on kidney graft and patient survival. Patients and methods. - A single-institution, retrospective study was performed on 202 renal transplant recipients, from January 2004 to December 2008. Two combined kidney and liver transplantations were excluded. The "one-stitch" extravesical ureteroneocystostomy technique, fast and easy to perform, was systematically used. The evaluated urinary complications were urinary fistula, ureteral stenosis, symptomatic ureteral reflux, stone formation and complicated hematuria. We tried to point out factors impacting urinary complications occurrence and studied grafts and patients survival according to the existence of urinary complications. Results. - Fifty-five patients presented urinary complications (27.5%). The most frequent urinary complications were complicated hematuria (36 over 200, 18%), ureteral stenosis (15 over 200, 7.5%). Few cases of stone disease (one over 200, 0.5%), urinary fistula (two over 200, 1%) and symptomatic ureteral reflux (one over 200, 0.5%) were noted. Male gender (100 vs 34, P=0.95), age (46.78 +/- 14.17 vs 48.06 +/- 14.19 years, P=0.58), Body mass index (24.14 +/- 5.04 vs 24.28 +/- 4.83, P=0.86) and past history of renal transplantations (16 +/- 3% vs 10 3%, P=0.27) as well as cold ischemia time (17.08 +/- 7.07 vs 16.9 +/- 8.95 hours, P=0.71) were not significantly different in the urinary complications group and the non-urinary complications group. Median hospitalization time was similar in both groups (14 vs 12 days, P=0.37). The existence of urinary complications didn't affect the 5 years kidney graft survival (91.9% vs 89.9%, HR 1.21, CI 95% [0.37-3.3], P=0.83) neither the 5 years patient survival (94.8% vs 92.15%, HR 0.52 Cl 95% [0.13-2.07], P=0.85). Conclusion. - If benign urinary complications in "one-stitch" ureteroneocystostomy were frequent in our study (17% grade II Clavien Dindo), kidney graft and patients survivals were not affected. (C) 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 29
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Urological complications in renal transplantation: Impact of a change of technique [J].
Butterworth, PC ;
Horsburgh, T ;
Veitch, PS ;
Bell, PRF ;
Nicholson, ML .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 79 (04) :499-502
[2]   The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications Five-Year Experience [J].
Clavien, Pierre A. ;
Barkun, Jeffrey ;
de Oliveira, Michelle L. ;
Vauthey, Jean Nicolas ;
Dindo, Daniel ;
Schulick, Richard D. ;
de Santibanes, Eduardo ;
Pekolj, Juan ;
Slankamenac, Ksenija ;
Bassi, Claudio ;
Graf, Rolf ;
Vonlanthen, Rene ;
Padbury, Robert ;
Cameron, John L. ;
Makuuchi, Masatoshi .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (02) :187-196
[3]   Is routine ureteric stenting needed in kidney transplantation? A randomized trial [J].
Dominguez, J ;
Clase, CM ;
Mahalati, K ;
MacDonald, AS ;
McAlister, VC ;
Belitsky, P ;
Kiberd, B ;
Lawen, JG .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 70 (04) :597-601
[4]   Ureteral complications: Analysis of risk factors in 1000 renal transplants [J].
Figueiredo, AJ ;
Parada, BA ;
Cunha, MFX ;
Mota, AJ ;
Furtado, AJ .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 35 (03) :1087-1088
[5]  
HAKIM NS, 1994, CLIN TRANSPLANT, V8, P504
[6]  
Hétet JF, 2005, PROG UROL, V15, P462
[7]  
Hooghe L, 1977, World J Surg, V2, P231
[8]   Ureteral complications in renal transplantation: A comparison of the Lich-Gregoir versus the Taguchi technique [J].
Lee, R. S. ;
Bakthavatsalam, R. ;
Marsh, C. L. ;
Kuhr, C. S. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 39 (05) :1461-1464
[9]   CADAVER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION - EMPHASIS ON UROLOGICAL ASPECTS [J].
MACKINNON, KJ ;
OLIVER, JA ;
MOREHOUSE, DD ;
TAGUCHI, Y .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1968, 99 (05) :486-+
[10]   Comparative study between two techniques of ureteroneocystostomy: Taguchi and Lich-Gregoir [J].
Moreira, P. ;
Parada, B. ;
Figueiredo, A. ;
Maia, N. ;
Nunes, P. ;
Bastos, C. ;
Mota, A. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 39 (08) :2480-2482