A proactive workers' safety risk evaluation framework based on position and posture data fusion

被引:46
作者
Chen, Hainan [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Xiaowei [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Zhuang [1 ,2 ]
Ke, Jinjing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Architecture & Civil Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Shenzhen Res Inst, Architecture & Civil Engn Res Ctr, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Data fusion; Construction safety; Localization; Posture detection; Indoor localization; CONSTRUCTION-INDUSTRY; OCCUPATIONAL-SAFETY; MOTION CAPTURE; BEHAVIOR; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEM; IMPROVEMENT; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.026
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Construction workers' safety risk evaluation mainly relies on manual observation with safety expert's experience. The manual process is labor intensive and time-consuming. A proactive workers' safety risk evaluation framework is needed to handle this issue. In this paper, the position and posture have been identified as the two key quantitative features, and a position and posture fusion principle is proposed for the evaluation of construction workers' behaviors safety risks. Three participants are invited to involve in the indoor construction activities with working at height three times, and the participants' locations, postures, and video are recorded using sensing devices. The participants' risk levels are evaluated based on posture, location, and posture-location fusion respectively. A comparison of the risk level evaluated based on those three approaches and the ground truth provided by the experts. The results show that the accuracy of automatic safety risk level evaluation based on location and posture fusion is 83%, compared with 81% and 57% achieved by the single-feature based risk level evaluation using location and posture respectively. Thus, the position and posture fusion-based evaluation is more reliable in real situations.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 288
页数:14
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, THESIS
[2]   Application of geographic information systems in construction safety planning [J].
Bansal, V. K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (01) :66-77
[3]  
Cao Z., 2016, ABS161108050 CORR, P1302
[4]   An observational method for Postural Ergonomic Risk Assessment (PERA) [J].
Chander, Divyaksh Subhash ;
Cavatorta, Maria Pia .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2017, 57 :32-41
[5]   A survey of depth and inertial sensor fusion for human action recognition [J].
Chen, Chen ;
Jafari, Roozbeh ;
Kehtarnavaz, Nasser .
MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2017, 76 (03) :4405-4425
[6]   Relationship between Unsafe Working Conditions and Workers' Behavior and Impact of Working Conditions on Injury Severity in US Construction Industry [J].
Chi, Seokho ;
Han, Sangwon ;
Kim, Dae Young .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 139 (07) :826-838
[7]   A deep hybrid learning model to detect unsafe behavior: Integrating convolution neural networks and long short-term memory [J].
Ding, Lieyun ;
Fang, Weili ;
Luo, Hanbin ;
Love, Peter E. D. ;
Zhong, Botao ;
Ouyang, Xi .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2018, 86 :118-124
[8]   Proactive struck-by risk detection with movement patterns and randomness [J].
Dong, Chao ;
Li, Heng ;
Luo, Xiaochun ;
Ding, Lieyun ;
Siebert, Joanna ;
Luo, Hanbin .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2018, 91 :246-255
[9]   Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features [J].
Flin, R ;
Mearns, K ;
O'Connor, P ;
Bryden, R .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2000, 34 (1-3) :177-192
[10]   Developing a Risk Assessment Model for construction safety [J].
Fung, Ivan W. H. ;
Tam, Vivian W. Y. ;
Lo, Tommy Y. ;
Lu, Lori L. H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2010, 28 (06) :593-600