Survival and Prognostic Factors Comparing Stage IB 1 versus Stage IB 2 Cervical Cancer Treated with Primary Radical Hysterectomy

被引:0
作者
Srisomboon, Jatupol [1 ]
Kietpeerakool, Chumnan [1 ]
Suprasert, Prapaporn [1 ]
Manopanya, Manatsawee [1 ]
Siriaree, Sitthicha [1 ]
Charoenkwan, Kittipat [1 ]
Cheewakriangkrai, Chalong [1 ]
Sae-Teng, Charuwan [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Chiang Mai 50000, Thailand
关键词
Radical hysterectomy; cervical cancer; stage IB; survival; prognostic factor; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP; MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS; UTERINE CERVIX; TUMOR SIZE; SURGERY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; RADIOTHERAPY; DIFFERENCE; HISTOLOGY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study was undertaken to compare the survival rates of stage IB 1 versus stage IB 2 cervical cancer patients and to evaluate the prognostic factors after treatment primarily with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHPL). Patients with stage IB cervical cancer undergoing primary RHPL at Chiang Mai University Hospital between January 2002 and December 2009 were evaluated for survival and recurrence. Clinicopathological variables were analyzed to identify the prognostic factors affecting the survival of the patients. During the study period, RHPL was performed on 570 stage IB 1 and 110 stage IB 2 cervical cancer patients. With a median follow-up of 48 months, the 5-year disease-free survivals were 98.1% and 82.8% respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified four significant prognostic factors affecting survival including sub-staging, non-squamous cell carcinoma histology, lymph node metastasis and the presence of lymph-vascular space invasion. In conclusion, with a primary radical hysterectomy, stage IB 1 cervical cancer patients have a significantly better survival rate than those with stage IB 2. Significant prognostic factors for stage IB cervical cancer include tumor histology, nodal status, and the presence of lymph-vascular space invasion.
引用
收藏
页码:1753 / 1756
页数:4
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   SELECTIVE RADIATION-THERAPY IN STAGE-IB UTERINE CERVICAL-CARCINOMA FOLLOWING RADICAL PELVIC-SURGERY [J].
ABDULHAYOGLU, G ;
RICH, WM ;
REYNOLDS, J ;
DISAIA, PJ .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1980, 10 (01) :84-92
[2]  
Barber B R, 1978, Obstet Gynecol, V52, P343
[3]   Prognostic Model for Survival in Patients With Early Stage Cervical Cancer [J].
Biewenga, Petra ;
van der Velden, Jacobus ;
Mol, Ben Willem J. ;
Stalpers, Lukas J. A. ;
Schilthuis, Marten S. ;
van der Steeg, Jan Willem ;
Burger, Matthe P. M. ;
Buist, Marrije R. .
CANCER, 2011, 117 (04) :768-776
[4]   Intent-to-treat analysis of stage Ib and IIa cervical cancer in the United States: Radiotherapy or surgery 1988-1995 [J].
Brewster, WR ;
Monk, BJ ;
Ziogas, A ;
Anton-Culver, H ;
Yamada, SD ;
Berman, ML .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (02) :248-254
[5]   ANALYSIS OF FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO TREATMENT FAILURES IN STAGE-IB AND STAGE-II-A CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX [J].
CHUNG, CK ;
NAHHAS, WA ;
STRYKER, JA ;
CURRY, SL ;
ABT, AB ;
MORTEL, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1980, 138 (05) :550-556
[6]   A PROSPECTIVE SURGICAL PATHOLOGICAL-STUDY OF STAGE 1 SQUAMOUS CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX - A GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP-STUDY [J].
DELGADO, G ;
BUNDY, BN ;
FOWLER, WC ;
STEHMAN, FB ;
SEVIN, B ;
CREASMAN, WT ;
MAJOR, F ;
DISAIA, P ;
ZAINO, R .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1989, 35 (03) :314-320
[7]   THE INFLUENCE OF TUMOR SIZE AND MORPHOLOGY ON THE OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH FIGO STAGE IB SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE UTERINE CERVIX [J].
EIFEL, PJ ;
MORRIS, M ;
WHARTON, JT ;
OSWALD, MJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 29 (01) :9-16
[8]  
Ferlay J, 2010, GLOBOCAN 2008 CANC I
[9]   Radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 vs IB2 carcinoma of the cervix: Does the new staging system predict morbidity and survival? [J].
Finan, MA ;
DeCesare, S ;
Fiorica, JV ;
Chambers, R ;
Hoffman, MS ;
Kline, RC ;
Roberts, WS ;
Cavanagh, D .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1996, 62 (02) :139-147
[10]  
Grisaru D, 2001, CANCER, V92, P2999, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20011215)92:12<2999::AID-CNCR10145>3.0.CO