Framing effect debiasing in medical decision making

被引:83
作者
Almashat, Sammy [1 ]
Ayotte, Brian [2 ]
Edelstein, Barry [3 ]
Margrett, Jennifer [4 ]
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Sch Med, Robert C Byrd Hlth Sci Ctr, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] VAMC, Ctr Hlth Serv Res Primary Care, Durham, NH USA
[3] W Virginia Univ, Dept Psychol, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[4] Iowa State Univ, Dept Human Dev & Family Studies, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
framing effect; decision bias; debiasing intervention; medical decision making; treatment choice;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.004
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: Numerous studies have demonstrated the robustness of the framing effect in a variety of contexts. The present study investigated the effects of a debiasing procedure designed to prevent the framing effect for young adults who made decisions based on hypothetical medical decision-making vignettes. Methods: The debiasing technique involved participants listing advantages and disadvantages of each treatment prior to making a choice. One hundred and two undergraduate students read a set of three medical treatment vignettes that presented information in terms of different outcome probabilities under either debiasing or control conditions. Results: The framing effect was demonstrated by the control group in two of the three vignettes. The debiasing group successfully avoided the framing effect for both of these vignettes. Conclusion: These results further support previous findings of the framing effect as well as an effective debiasing technique. This study improved upon previous framing debiasing studies by including a control group and personal medical scenarios, as well as demonstrating debiasing in a framing condition in which the framing effect was demonstrated without a debiasing procedure. Practice implications: The findings suggest a relatively simple manipulation may circumvent the use of decision-making heuristics in patients. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 107
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[2]   COSTS AND BENEFITS OF JUDGMENT ERRORS - IMPLICATIONS FOR DEBIASING [J].
ARKES, HR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (03) :486-498
[3]  
CHAPMAN GB, 2000, DECISION MAKING HLTH, P183
[4]  
Dawes RM., 1988, RATIONAL CHOICE UNCE
[5]   Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money or your life? [J].
Fagley, NS ;
Miller, PM .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1997, 71 (03) :355-373
[6]  
Hastie R., 2001, RATIONAL CHOICE UNCE
[7]   Problem domain and prospect frame: Choice under opportunity versus threat [J].
Highhouse, S ;
Paese, PW .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1996, 22 (02) :124-132
[8]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[9]   Framing effects in younger and older adults [J].
Kim, S ;
Goldstein, D ;
Hasher, L ;
Zacks, RT .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2005, 60 (04) :P215-P218
[10]   The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis [J].
Kuhberger, A .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1998, 75 (01) :23-55