Participation through Publics: Did Dewey answer Lippmann?

被引:21
作者
Bohman, James [1 ]
机构
[1] St Louis Univ, Dept Philosophy, St Louis, MO 63156 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1163/18758185-90000155
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
John Dewey's Public and its Problems provides his fullest account of democracy under the emerging conditions of complex, modern societies. While responding to Lippmann's criticisms of democracy as self-rule, Dewey acknowledges the truth of many of the social scientific criticisms of democracy, while he defends democracy by reconstructing it. Dewey seeks a new public in a "Great Community" based on more face-to-face communication about nonlocal issues. Yet Dewey fails to consistently apply his own reconstructive argument, retreating to a communal basis for democracy. I offer an extension of Dewey's argument in this direction in which "publics" and not "the public" offer the best basis for reconstructing democracy.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 68
页数:20
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Conceptualising environmental collective action: why gender matters [J].
Agarwal, B .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2000, 24 (03) :283-310
[2]  
BABOCK L, 2006, LAW SOCIAL INQUIRY, V22, P913
[3]  
Bohman James, CAMBRIDGE C IN PRESS
[4]  
DASTON L, 1992, SOC STUD SCI, V22, P605
[5]  
Dewey, 1927, LW, V2, P219
[6]  
Dewey, 1939, THEORY VALUATION LW, V13, P320
[7]  
Dewey, 1922, HUMAN NATURE CONDUCT, V14, P139
[8]  
Dewey, 1938, LOGIC THEORY INQUIRY, V12, P493
[9]  
Dewey, 1935, LIBERALISM SOCIAL AC, V11, P50
[10]  
Dewey, 1938, LOGIC THEORY INQUIRY, V12, P500