Supplier Selection Through a Hybrid MCDM-QFD Method: A Case Study in Mapna Group

被引:0
作者
Tayyar, Seyed Hassan [1 ]
Soltani, Roya [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Tehran, Iran
[2] KHATAM Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Tehran, Iran
来源
LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, LSCM 2020 | 2021年 / 1458卷
关键词
Supply chain management; Strategic sourcing; Supplier evaluation; Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM); Quality Function Deployment (QFD); QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; MULTIPLE-CRITERIA; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; AHP; INTEGRATION; LOGISTICS; DECISION;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-89743-7_8
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Sourcing and procurement are two strategic aspects of any organization whereby they can reduce production and material costs and increase the quality all of which lead to another to increase the organization's profit. Supplier selection is an important task in supply chain management, which helps organizations to achieve this goal. In this paper, a new customer-oriented and qualitative approach is presented to investigate the supplier relationship management in supply chai ns and extract suitable technical criteria for evaluating organization's supply chain requirements. For this purpose, a systematic method including a total quality management (TQM) tool (i.e. Quality Function Deployment (QFD)) and a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) technique (i.e. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)) is employed to respectively specify technical criteria and the corresponding weights. Then, the suppliers are ranked by employing the simple additive weighting (SAW) method. The proposed method is implemented to a case study taken fromMapna group located in Iran. The results show that, the proposed method decreases the cost of inappropriate selection of suppliers and improve the supplier selection process by choosing suitable evaluation criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 136
页数:20
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   RETRACTED: Three-way decisions based on neutrosophic sets and AHP-QFD framework for supplier selection problem (Retracted article. See vol. 128, pg. 569, 2022) [J].
Abdel-Basset, Mohamed ;
Manogaran, Gunasekaran ;
Mohamed, Mai ;
Chilamkurti, Naveen .
FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2018, 89 :19-30
[2]   Fuzzy QFD approach for managing SCOR performance indicators [J].
Akkawuttiwanich, Piyanee ;
Yenradee, Pisal .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 122 :189-201
[3]   A customer based supplier selection process that combines quality function deployment, the analytic network process and a Markov chain [J].
Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 263 (03) :1049-1062
[4]   A multi-objective mathematical model integrating environmental concerns for supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy QFD in beverages industry [J].
Babbar, Chirag ;
Amin, Saman Hassanzadeh .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2018, 92 :27-38
[5]  
Bevilacqua M., 2006, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, V12, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.pursup.2006.02.001
[6]   Development and test of a new fuzzy-QFD approach for characterizing customers rating of extra virgin olive oil [J].
Bevilacqua, Maurizio ;
Ciarapica, Filippo Emanuele ;
Marchetti, Barbara .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2012, 24 (01) :75-84
[7]   Integrating AHP with QFD for robot selection under requirement perspective [J].
Bhattacharya, A ;
Sarkar, B ;
Mukherjee, SK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2005, 43 (17) :3671-3685
[8]  
Bhattacharya J., 2010, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V10, P1013
[9]   A QFD-ANP Method for Supplier Selection with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks Considerations [J].
Bottani, Eleonora ;
Centobelli, Piera ;
Murino, Teresa ;
Shekarian, Ehsan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2018, 17 (03) :911-939
[10]   Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD - Types of research, difficulties and benefits [J].
Carnevalli, Jose A. ;
Miguel, Paulo Cauchick .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2008, 114 (02) :737-754