Comparative evaluation of efficacy of oxygenation using high flow nasal cannula vs. conventional nasal cannula during procedural sedation for endoscopic ultrasound: A pilot study

被引:5
作者
Shukla, Kamalendra [1 ]
Parikh, Badal [1 ]
Kumar, Alok [1 ]
Nakra, Monish [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Venkateshwar Hosp, Army Hosp Res & Referral, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, New Delhi, India
[2] Venkateshwar Hosp, Dept Crit Care, New Delhi, India
关键词
Cannula; endoscopy; endosonography; oxygen inhalation therapy; patient satisfaction; POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; PROPOFOL SEDATION; THERAPY; ANESTHESIA; EXTUBATION; MIDAZOLAM;
D O I
10.4103/joacp.JOACP_371_20
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has numerous advantages against conventional oxygen therapy delivery systems. However, there is limited evidence supporting the use of HFNC in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) under procedural sedation. The aims of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of two different oxygen delivery devices, that is,HFNCand conventional nasal cannula on the oxygenation status of patients during procedural sedation for EUS. Material and Methods: Sixty adult patients undergoing EUS for various ailments were randomized to two groups group HFNC (n=30) and group nasal cannula [NC (n = 30)]. HFNC (AIRVO2, Fisher and Paykel Healthcare, New Zealand) was used on patients in the group HFNC. Respiratory status of the patients was assessed using pulse oximetry, respiratory rate, procedural airway complications, and oxygen therapy adjustments. The endoscopist assessed the ease of performing EUS at the end of the procedure and patient satisfaction score (PSS) was assessed by using a Likert score in the post-anesthesia care unit. Results: SpO2 measurements in the HFNC group during the procedure were marginally better compared to the NC group but this failed to reach statistical significance. Also, no significant association was found between both groups while comparing desaturation events (P = 0.499), patient satisfaction score (PSS) and endendoscopist's satisfaction score (ESS) (P = 0.795). Both the groups were comparable in terms of airway manipulation, use of airway adjuncts, need to increase oxygen flow rate, endoscope removal, apneic episodes, hypotension, and bradycardia. No major complications were observed in either group. Conclusion: HFNC use in patients undergoing EUS is not superior when compared to conventional nasal cannula oxygen therapy. HFNC failed to show any significant impact on decreasing the risk of desaturation events and airway manipulation during the procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 654
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Adverse events during monitored anesthesia care for GI endoscopy: an 8-year experience
    Agostoni, Massimo
    Fanti, Lorella
    Gemma, Marco
    Pasculli, Nicola
    Beretta, Luigi
    Testoni, Pier Alberto
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 74 (02) : 266 - 275
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, GUID US PROP SED AD
  • [3] Bell GD, 2004, ENDOSCOPY, V36, P23
  • [4] A prospective assessment of sedation-related adverse events and patient and endoscopist satisfaction in ERCP with anesthesiologist-administered sedation
    Berzin, Tyler M.
    Sanaka, Sirish
    Barnett, Sheila R.
    Sundar, Eswar
    Sepe, Paul S.
    Jakubowski, Moshe
    Pleskow, Douglas K.
    Chuttani, Ram
    Sawhney, Mandeep S.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 73 (04) : 710 - 717
  • [5] Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus Infant Flow for preterm infants
    Campbell, D. M.
    Shah, P. S.
    Shah, V.
    Kelly, E. N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2006, 26 (09) : 546 - 549
  • [6] Oxygen delivery through high-flow nasal cannulae increase end-expiratory lung volume and reduce respiratory rate in post-cardiac surgical patients
    Corley, A.
    Caruana, L. R.
    Barnett, A. G.
    Tronstad, O.
    Fraser, J. F.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 107 (06) : 998 - 1004
  • [7] Lung recruitment and breathing pattern during variable versus continuous flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants: An evaluation of three devices
    Courtney, SE
    Pyon, KH
    Saslow, JG
    Arnold, GK
    Pandit, PB
    Habib, RH
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2001, 107 (02) : 304 - 308
  • [8] Comparing two methods of delivering high-flow gas therapy by nasal cannula following endotracheal extubation: a prospective, randomized, masked, crossover trial
    D Woodhead, D.
    Lambert, D. K.
    Clark, J. M.
    Christensen, R. D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2006, 26 (08) : 481 - 485
  • [9] High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the management of apnea of prematurity
    Dutta, S
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2002, 109 (04) : 718 - 719
  • [10] Sedation and monitoring for gastrointestinal endoscopy: A nationwide web survey in Italy
    Fanti, Lorella
    Agostoni, Massimo
    Gemma, Marco
    Radaelli, Franco
    Conigliaro, Rita
    Beretta, Luigi
    Rossi, Gemma
    Guslandi, Mario
    Testoni, Pier Alberto
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2011, 43 (09) : 726 - 730