Animal research as a basis for clinical trials

被引:19
|
作者
Faggion, Clovis M., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Fac Dent, Dept Periodontol, D-48149 Munster, Germany
关键词
animal experimentation; clinical trials; systematic review; meta-analysis; BIAS; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/eos.12175
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Animal experiments are critical for the development of new human therapeutics because they provide mechanistic information, as well as important information on efficacy and safety. Some evidence suggests that authors of animal research in dentistry do not observe important methodological issues when planning animal experiments, for example sample-size calculation. Low-quality animal research directly interferes with development of the research process in which multiple levels of research are interconnected. For example, high-quality animal experiments generate sound information for the further planning and development of randomized controlled trials in humans. These randomized controlled trials are the main source for the development of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which will generate the best evidence for the development of clinical guidelines. Therefore, adequate planning of animal research is a sine qua non condition for increasing efficacy and efficiency in research. Ethical concerns arise when animal research is not performed with high standards. This Focus article presents the latest information on the standards of animal research in dentistry, more precisely in the field of implant dentistry. Issues on precision and risk of bias are discussed, and strategies to reduce risk of bias in animal research are reported.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 64
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Multiple outcomes and analyses in clinical trials create challenges for interpretation and research synthesis
    Mayo-Wilson, Evan
    Fusco, Nicole
    Li, Tianjing
    Hong, Hwanhee
    Canner, Joseph K.
    Dickersin, Kay
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 86 : 39 - 50
  • [33] Postrandomization Confounding Challenges the Applicability of Randomized Clinical Trials in Comparative Effectiveness Research
    Peng, Ya-Guang
    Nie, Xiao-Lu
    Feng, Jing-Jing
    Peng, Xiao-Xia
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 130 (08) : 993 - 996
  • [34] Implications of Recent Clinical Trials and Hypertension Guidelines on Stroke and Future Cerebrovascular Research
    Lackland, Daniel T.
    Carey, Robert M.
    Conforto, Adriana B.
    Rosendorff, Clive
    Whelton, Paul K.
    Gorelick, Philip B.
    STROKE, 2018, 49 (03) : 772 - 779
  • [35] Listening to the elephant in the room: response-shift effects in clinical trials research
    Schwartz, Carolyn E.
    Huang, I. -Chan
    Rohde, Gudrun
    Skolasky, Richard L.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2022, 6 (01)
  • [36] Research fundamentals: III. Elements of a research protocol for clinical trials
    Silverman, R
    Kwiatkowski, T
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 5 (12) : 1218 - 1223
  • [37] A Short History of the Consideration of Sex Differences in Biomedical Research - Lessons for the In Vitro Community from Animal Models and Human Clinical Trials
    Gutleb, Helena Niobe Renate
    Gutleb, Arno Christian
    ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2023, 51 (02): : 144 - 150
  • [38] The role of clinical research nurses in minority recruitment to cancer clinical trials
    Legor, Kristen A.
    Hayman, Laura L.
    Foust, Janice B.
    Blazey, Meghan L.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 110
  • [39] The Central Register of Clinical Trials: Current Status of Clinical Research in Poland
    Andrzej Czarnecki
    Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 1997, 31 (3): : 873 - 877
  • [40] Clinical Research: From Case Reports to International Multicenter Clinical Trials
    Finfer, Simon
    Cook, Deborah
    Machado, Flavia R.
    Perner, Anders
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (11) : 1866 - 1882