Animal research as a basis for clinical trials

被引:19
作者
Faggion, Clovis M., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Fac Dent, Dept Periodontol, D-48149 Munster, Germany
关键词
animal experimentation; clinical trials; systematic review; meta-analysis; BIAS; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/eos.12175
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Animal experiments are critical for the development of new human therapeutics because they provide mechanistic information, as well as important information on efficacy and safety. Some evidence suggests that authors of animal research in dentistry do not observe important methodological issues when planning animal experiments, for example sample-size calculation. Low-quality animal research directly interferes with development of the research process in which multiple levels of research are interconnected. For example, high-quality animal experiments generate sound information for the further planning and development of randomized controlled trials in humans. These randomized controlled trials are the main source for the development of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which will generate the best evidence for the development of clinical guidelines. Therefore, adequate planning of animal research is a sine qua non condition for increasing efficacy and efficiency in research. Ethical concerns arise when animal research is not performed with high standards. This Focus article presents the latest information on the standards of animal research in dentistry, more precisely in the field of implant dentistry. Issues on precision and risk of bias are discussed, and strategies to reduce risk of bias in animal research are reported.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 64
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   OSSEOINTEGRATED TITANIUM IMPLANTS - REQUIREMENTS FOR ENSURING A LONG-LASTING, DIRECT BONE-TO-IMPLANT ANCHORAGE IN MAN [J].
ALBREKTSSON, T ;
BRANEMARK, PI ;
HANSSON, HA ;
LINDSTROM, J .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1981, 52 (02) :155-170
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[3]   Two Years Later: Journals Are Not Yet Enforcing the ARRIVE Guidelines on Reporting Standards for Pre-Clinical Animal Studies [J].
Baker, David ;
Lidster, Katie ;
Sottomayor, Ana ;
Amor, Sandra .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2014, 12 (01)
[4]  
Brånemark R, 2001, J REHABIL RES DEV, V38, P175
[5]   Risk of bias of animal studies on regenerative procedures for periodontal and peri-implant bone defects - a systematic review [J].
Faggion, Clovis Mariano, Jr. ;
Giannakopoulos, Nikolaos Nikitas ;
Listl, Stefan .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2011, 38 (12) :1154-1160
[6]   Assessment of replication of research evidence from animals to humans in studies on peri-implantitis therapy [J].
Faggion, Clovis Mariano, Jr. ;
Schmitter, Marc ;
Tu, Yu-Kang .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2009, 37 (10) :737-747
[7]  
GUYATT G, 1995, CAN MED ASSOC J, V152, P27
[8]   GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence-inconsistency [J].
Guyatt, Gordon H. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Woodcock, James ;
Brozek, Jan ;
Helfand, Mark ;
Alonso-Coello, Pablo ;
Glasziou, Paul ;
Jaeschke, Roman ;
Akl, Elie A. ;
Norris, Susan ;
Vist, Gunn ;
Dahm, Philipp ;
Shukla, Vijay K. ;
Higgins, Julian ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (12) :1294-1302
[9]   SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies [J].
Hooijmans, Carlijn R. ;
Rovers, Maroeska M. ;
de Vries, Rob B. M. ;
Leenaars, Marlies ;
Ritskes-Hoitinga, Merel ;
Langendam, Miranda W. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14
[10]   Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research [J].
Kilkenny, Carol ;
Browne, William J. ;
Cuthill, Innes C. ;
Emerson, Michael ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2010, 8 (06)