There is no correlation between a delayed gastric conduit emptying and the occurrence of an anastomotic leakage after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy

被引:8
作者
Babic, Benjamin [1 ]
Schiffmann, Lars Mortimer [1 ]
Fuchs, Hans Friedrich [1 ]
Mueller, Dolores Thea [1 ]
Schmidt, Thomas [1 ]
Mallmann, Christoph [1 ]
Mielke, Laura [1 ]
Frebel, Antonia [1 ]
Schiller, Petra [2 ]
Bludau, Marc [1 ]
Chon, Seung-Hun [1 ]
Schroeder, Wolfgang [1 ]
Bruns, Christiane Josephine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Dept Gen Visceral Canc & Transplant Surg, Kerpener Str 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Inst Med Stat & Computat Biol, Cologne, Germany
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2022年 / 36卷 / 09期
关键词
DGCE; Esophagectomy; Anastomotic leakage; ECCG; Esophageal cancer; Esophagogastric junction cancer; MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY; DENERVATED STOMACH; PYLORIC DRAINAGE; RISK-FACTORS; RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS; OUTLET OBSTRUCTION; CANCER; RECONSTRUCTION; ERYTHROMYCIN; SUBSTITUTE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-021-08962-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Esophagectomy is the gold standard in the surgical therapy of esophageal cancer. It is either performed thoracoabdominal with a intrathoracic anastomosis or in proximal cancers with a three-incision esophagectomy and cervical reconstruction. Delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) is the most common functional postoperative disorder after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (IL). Pneumonia is significantly more often in patients with DGCE. It remains unclear if DGCE anastomotic leakage (AL) is associated. Aim of our study is to analyze, if AL is more likely to happen in patients with a DGCE. Patients and methods 816 patients were included. All patients have had an IL due to esophageal/esophagogastric-junction cancer between 2013 and 2018 in our center. Intrathoracic esophagogastric end-to-side anastomosis was performed with a circular stapling device. The collective has been divided in two groups depending on the occurrence of DGCE. The diagnosis DGCE was determined by clinical and radiologic criteria in accordance with current international expert consensus. Results 27.7% of all patients suffered from DGCE postoperatively. Female patients had a significantly higher chance to suffer from DGCE than male patients (34.4% vs. 26.2% vs., p = 0.040). Pneumonia was more common in patients with DGCE (13.7% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.025), furthermore hospitalization was longer in DGCE patients (median 17 days vs. 14d, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of type II anastomotic leakage, (5.8% in both groups DGCE). All patients with ECCG type II AL (n = 47; 5.8%) were treated successfully by endoluminal/endoscopic therapy. The subgroup analysis showed that ASA >= III (7.6% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.05) and the histology squamous cell carcinoma (9.8% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.01) were independent risk factors for the occurrence of an AL. Conclusion Our study confirms that DGCE after IL is a common finding in a standardized collective of patients in a high-volume center. This functional disorder is associated with a higher rate of pneumonia and a prolonged hospital stay. Still, there is no association between DGCE and the occurrence of an AL after esophagectomy. The hypothesis, that an DGCE results in a higher pressure on the anastomosis and therefore to an AL in consequence, can be refuted. DGCE is not a pathogenetic factor for an AL.
引用
收藏
页码:6777 / 6783
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Surgical Techniques to Prevent Delayed Gastric Emptying After Esophagectomy With Gastric Interposition: A Systematic Review [J].
Akkerman, Ronald D. L. ;
Haverkamp, Leonie ;
van Hillegersberg, Richard ;
Ruurda, Jelle P. .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 98 (04) :1512-1519
[2]   Nutrition Impact Symptoms Are Prognostic of Quality of Life and Mortality After Surgery for Oesophageal Cancer [J].
Anandavadivelan, Poorna ;
Martin, Lena ;
Djarv, Therese ;
Johar, Asif ;
Lagergren, Pernilla .
CANCERS, 2018, 10 (09)
[3]   The impact of pyloric drainage on clinical outcome following esophagectomy: a systematic review [J].
Arya, S. ;
Markar, S. R. ;
Karthikesalingam, A. ;
Hanna, G. B. .
DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2015, 28 (04) :326-335
[4]   Risk factors for delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy [J].
Benedix, Frank ;
Willems, Tobias ;
Kropf, Siegfried ;
Schubert, Daniel ;
Stuebs, Patrick ;
Wolff, Stephanie .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2017, 402 (03) :547-554
[5]   Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial [J].
Biere, Surya S. A. Y. ;
Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge ;
Maas, Kirsten W. ;
Bonavina, Luigi ;
Rosman, Camiel ;
Roig Garcia, Josep ;
Gisbertz, Suzanne S. ;
Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G. ;
Hollmann, Markus W. ;
de lange, Elly S. M. ;
Bonjer, H. Jaap ;
van der Peet, Donald L. ;
Cuesta, Miguel A. .
LANCET, 2012, 379 (9829) :1887-1892
[6]   Managing complications I: leaks, strictures, emptying, reflux, chylothorax [J].
Chen, Ke-Neng .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2014, 6 :S355-S363
[7]   The denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute is a contractile organ [J].
Collard, JM ;
Romagnoli, R ;
Otte, JB ;
Kestens, PJ .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 227 (01) :33-39
[8]   FACTORS AFFECTING CERVICAL ANASTOMOTIC LEAK AND STRICTURE FORMATION FOLLOWING ESOPHAGOGASTRECTOMY AND GASTRIC TUBE INTERPOSITION [J].
DEWAR, L ;
GELFAND, G ;
FINLEY, RJ ;
EVANS, K ;
INCULET, R ;
NELEMS, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 163 (05) :484-489
[9]   Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample [J].
Fuchs, Hans F. ;
Harnsberger, Cristina R. ;
Broderick, Ryan C. ;
Chang, David C. ;
Sandler, Bryan J. ;
Jacobsen, Garth R. ;
Bouvet, Michael ;
Horgan, Santiago .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (06) :2491-2497
[10]  
GUPTA S, 1989, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V84, P921