Probing key informants' views of health equity within the World Health Organization's Urban HEART initiative

被引:12
作者
Amri, Michelle [1 ,2 ]
O'Campo, Patricia [2 ,3 ]
Enright, Theresa [4 ]
Siddiqi, Arjumand [2 ,5 ]
Di Ruggiero, Erica [2 ]
Bump, Jesse Boardman [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Takemi Program Int Hlth, 665 Huntington Ave,Bldg 1, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, 155 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5T 1P8, Canada
[3] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, 209 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 1T8, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Polit Sci, 100 St George St, Toronto, ON M5S 3G3, Canada
[5] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[6] Univ Bergen, Bergen Ctr Eth & Prior Setting, Bergen, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1186/s12889-022-14395-z
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
To date, no studies have assessed how those involved in the World Health Organization's (WHO) work understand the concept of health equity. To fill the gap, this research poses the question, "how do Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (Urban HEART) key informants understand the concept of health equity?", with Urban HEART being selected given the focus on health equity. To answer this question, this study undertakes synchronous electronic interviews with key informants to assess how they understand health equity within the context of Urban HEART. Key findings demonstrate that: (i) equity is seen as a core value and inequities were understood to be avoidable, systematic, unnecessary, and unfair; (ii) there was a questionable acceptance of need to act, given that political sensitivity arose around acknowledging inequities as "unnecessary"; (iii) despite this broader understanding of the key aspects of health inequity, the concept of health equity was seen as vague; (iv) the recognized vagueness inherent in the concept of health equity may be due to various factors including country differences; (v) how the terms "health inequity" and "health inequality" were used varied drastically; and (vi) when speaking about equity, a wide range of aspects emerged. Moving forward, it would be important to establish a shared understanding across key terms and seek clarification, prior to any global health initiatives, whether explicitly focused on health equity or not.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Amri M., CRITICAL DISCOURSE A
[2]  
Amri M, GEOGRAPHIES GLOBAL H
[3]  
Amri M., 2020, Social Sci Protocols, V3
[4]   Utilizing asynchronous email interviews for health research: overview of benefits and drawbacks [J].
Amri, Michelle ;
Angelakis, Christina ;
Logan, Dilani .
BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2021, 14 (01)
[5]   Scoping review of the World Health Organization's underlying equity discourses: apparent ambiguities, inadequacy, and contradictions [J].
Amri, Michelle M. ;
Jessiman-Perreault, Genevieve ;
Siddiqi, Arjumand ;
O'Campo, Patricia ;
Enright, Theresa ;
Di Ruggiero, Erica .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2021, 20 (01)
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, SAGE ENCY QUALITATIV
[7]   Health disparities and health equity: Concepts and measurement [J].
Braveman, P .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 27 :167-194
[8]   Defining equity in health [J].
Braveman, P ;
Gruskin, S .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2003, 57 (04) :254-258
[9]  
Centre for Research on Inner City Health, ST MICH HOSP URB HEA
[10]   Taking stock of the social determinants of health: A scoping review [J].
Lucyk, Kelsey ;
McLaren, Lindsay .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05)