Responding to the spread of conspiracy theories

被引:8
|
作者
Shoaibi, Nader [1 ]
机构
[1] Gonzaga Univ, Dept Philosophy, Philosophy, Spokane, WA 99258 USA
来源
INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY | 2022年
关键词
Conspiracy theories; echo chambers; shaming; activism; social epistemology; disagreement;
D O I
10.1080/0020174X.2022.2126393
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Conspiracy theories are spreading faster than ever and pose a real danger to our societies. It is natural to accuse the consumers of conspiracy theories of irrationality - that they are either not looking at or appropriately sensitive to all the available evidence. In this paper, I attempt to determine if we can make sense of this general idea. I argue that we cannot: conspiracy theories do not spread because the people who believe them are irrational - at least, not necessarily so. In addition, I explore some alternative strategies for responding to the problem of the spread of conspiracy theories. I argue that in addition to confrontational strategies such as social shaming, we need more constructive programs of community activism to battle the spread of conspiracy theories.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条