Long-term impact of contact precautions cessation for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)

被引:6
|
作者
AlMohanna, Zainab [1 ]
Snavely, Anna C. [2 ]
Viviano, James P. [1 ]
Bischoff, Werner E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Atrium Hlth Wake Forest Baptist, Infect Prevent & Hlth Syst Epidemiol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[2] Wake Forest Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Data Sci, Winston Salem, NC 27101 USA
关键词
Healthcare associated infections; Contact precautions; Personal protective equipment; Central Line Associated Bloodstream  Infections; MRSA bacteremia LabID events; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; TRANSMISSION; VRE; ENTEROCOCCUS; ORGANISMS; BACTERIA; GLOVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajic.2021.10.044
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major cause of healthcare-associated infections (HAI). Contact isolation has been traditionally implemented to stop transmission but its impact is increasingly questioned. Methods: A single center, retrospective, nonrandomized, observational, quasi-experimental study compared MRSA HAI rates between pre-/postdiscontinuation of MRSA contact isolation in a tertiary university hospital over 68 months. Data on primary outcomes, Central line-associated bloodstream infections and MRSA LabID bacteremia events, were analyzed by interrupted time series design using segmented Poisson regression modeling. As secondary outcomes catheter-associated urinary tract infections , ventilator-associated pneu-monia , surgical site infections and hospital-associated pneumonia were compared using Fisher's exact tests. Current savings due to discontinuation were calculated based on gown use. Results: Two hundred and ninty-five patients developed 399 HAIs. Infection rates between pre-and postin-terventions were as follows: Central line-associated bloodstream infections: (0.02% vs 0.02%; P-value = .64), MRSA LabID events: (0.01% vs 0.02%; P-value = .32), hospital-associated pneumonia: (0.01% vs 0.01%; P- value = .64), catheter-associated urinary tract infections: (0% vs 0.01%; P-value = .56), ventilator-associated pneumonia: (0.01% vs 0.01%; P-value = .32), surgical site infections (0.55% vs 0.15%; P-value = .03). Savings amount to $139,228 annually. Conclusions: Discontinuing CP did not negatively impact endemic MRSA HAI rates between pre-postdiscon-tinuation periods and saved costs for isolation materials. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 341
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Effectiveness of Contact Precautions on Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Long-term Care Across the United States
    Morgan, Daniel J.
    Zhan, Min
    Goto, Michihiko
    Franciscus, Carrie
    Alexander, Bruce
    Vaughan-Sarrazin, Mary
    Roghmann, Mary-Claire
    Pineles, Lisa
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 71 (07) : 1676 - 1683
  • [2] Discontinuation of Contact Precautions for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Pediatric Healthcare System
    Most, Zachary M.
    Phillips, Bethany
    Sebert, Michael E.
    JOURNAL OF THE PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES SOCIETY, 2024, 13 (02) : 123 - 128
  • [3] Contact precautions for Clostridium difficile and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
    Prieto, Jacqui
    Clark, Jill Macleod
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2005, 10 (05) : 511 - 526
  • [4] Impact of rapid screening for discontinuation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus contact precautions
    Shenoy, Erica S.
    Lee, Hang
    Cotter, Jessica A.
    Ware, Winston
    Kelbaugh, Douglas
    Weil, Eric
    Walensky, Rochelle P.
    Hooper, David C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2016, 44 (02) : 215 - 221
  • [5] Degowning the controversies of contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A review
    Kullar, Ravina
    Vassallo, Angela
    Turkel, Sarah
    Chopra, Teena
    Kaye, Keith S.
    Dhar, Sorabh
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2016, 44 (01) : 97 - 103
  • [6] Evaluation of contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus
    Bardossy, Ana Cecilia
    Alsafadi, Muhammad Yasser
    Starr, Patricia
    Chami, Eman
    Pietsch, Jennifer
    Moreno, Daniela
    Johnson, Laura
    Alangaden, George
    Zervos, Marcus
    Reyes, Katherine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2017, 45 (12) : 1369 - 1371
  • [7] Can we reduce contact precautions days for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin resistant Enterococcus infected patients?
    Thottacherry, Elizabeth Dilip
    Hassoun, Ali
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 13 (08) : 1118 - 1122
  • [8] Contact Precautions for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Are They Still Valuable?
    Jennifer Brown
    Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports, 2014, 2 (4) : 189 - 195
  • [9] Contact Precautions for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Are They Still Valuable?
    Brown, Jennifer
    CURRENT EMERGENCY AND HOSPITAL MEDICINE REPORTS, 2014, 2 (04): : 189 - 195
  • [10] Are Contact Precautions "Essential" for the Prevention of Healthcare-associated Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus?
    Diekema, Daniel J.
    Nori, Priya
    Stevens, Michael P.
    Smith, Matthew W.
    Coffey, K. C.
    Morgan, Daniel J.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 78 (05) : 1289 - 1294