Street-Level Management: A Clientele-Agent Perspective on Implementation

被引:86
作者
Gassner, Drorit [1 ]
Gofen, Anat [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
PUBLIC-SERVICES; JOB-SATISFACTION; MIDDLE MANAGERS; POLICY; COPRODUCTION; ORGANIZATION; BUREAUCRACY; WORK; LINE; PROFESSIONALS;
D O I
10.1093/jopart/muy051
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
It is now widely accepted that public policy is not merely about its formal wording but rather the ways it is implemented. Implementation portrayals are not uniform: some focus on street-level delivery while others refer to managerial actions of different administration levels. Although varied, current implementation research overlooks the distinct position of chief executive officers of street-level organizations, who are overarchingly in charge of, and accountable for, the direct delivery of multiple policies to a local target population. This study distinguishes them as a unique public management category, termed here "street-level management," and explores their contribution drawing on interviews with school principals, police station chiefs, and heads of social services bureaus (N = 78), as well as on official documents. Because street-level managers (SLMs) were found to approach their target populations as a collective endowed with contextual characteristics and a particular mix of policy preferences and needs, they are redefined as "policy clientele." To convey that policy clientele is the main lens through which street-level management is exercised, a "clientele-agent" perspective is proposed as complementing state-agent and citizen-agent viewpoints on street-level implementation. A clientele-agent approach is evidenced in SLMs' ongoing efforts to facilitate reciprocal relationships with policy clientele and in four street-level managerial functions-translation, adaptation, mobilization, and articulation. Uncovering overlooked collective aspects of street-level implementation and the involvement of policy clientele in direct delivery arrangements, street-level management allows for a more nuanced understanding of the interstices between policy making and direct delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 568
页数:18
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]  
Ahmed Z., 2010, Journal of Organizational Culture, Communication and Conflict, V14, P107
[2]   Why do public-sector clients coproduce? Toward a contingency theory [J].
Alford, J .
ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2002, 34 (01) :32-56
[3]   CO-PRODUCTION, INTERDEPENDENCE AND PUBLICNESS Extending public servicedominant logic [J].
Alford, John .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2016, 18 (05) :673-691
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, STRATEG MANAG
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199238958.003.0011
[7]  
Balogun I, 2003, BRIT J MANAGE, V14, P69
[8]  
Bardach Eugene., 1977, IMPLEMENTATION GAME
[9]   Implementation studies: Time for a revival? Personal reflections on 20 years of implementation studies [J].
Barrett, SM .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2004, 82 (02) :249-262
[10]   Street-Level Bureaucrats as Individual Policymakers: The Relationship between Attitudes and Coping Behavior toward Vulnerable Children and Youth [J].
Baviskar, Siddhartha ;
Winter, Soren C. .
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 20 (02) :316-353