Tamilnadu Omnibus Travels Evaluation Using TOPSIS and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods

被引:1
|
作者
Vadivel, S. M. [1 ]
Sequeira, A. H. [2 ]
Jauhar, Sunil Kumar [3 ]
Chandana, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Engn, Dept Ind & Prod Engn, Mysuru 570008, India
[2] Natl Inst Technol Karnataka, Sch Management, Surathkal 575025, India
[3] Indian Inst Management Kashipur, Kundeshwari 244713, Uttarakhand, India
关键词
TOPSIS; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM); Performance measurement; Omnibus transportation; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-96299-9_3
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This research uses an effective fuzzy multi-criteria method to evaluate the performance of eight omnibus operators in Tamilnadu, India's southernmost state (MA). The data was gathered from passengers (regular travelers) and the management of omnibus travel operators. Passengers provided qualitative data, while management offered quantitative data. To estimate the omnibus travels effectiveness, the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) technique and Fuzzy TOPSIS were employed to analyze the subjective assessments of both quantitative and qualitative data. Using linguistic concepts, the subjectiveness and inaccuracy of the performance assessment methods are expressed as fuzzy numbers. Traditionally, fuzzy MA models are often used to find the degree of possibility of an alternative of each attribute and sub-attributes to avoid complicated and inaccurate comparisons of fuzzy numbers. Then, grounded on the fuzzy techniques, it is converted into a weighted fuzzy performance index for each alternative. This technique is computationally efficient, and the principles behind it are basic and straightforward to comprehend.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 31
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating sustainable water management strategies using TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS methods
    Han, Fang
    Alkhawaji, Rami N.
    Shafieezadeh, M. Mehdi
    APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2025, 15 (01)
  • [2] An Exploration of Issues and Limitations in Current Methods of TOPSIS and Fuzzy TOPSIS
    Madi, Elissa Nadia
    Garibaldi, Jonathan M.
    Wagner, Christian
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE), 2016, : 2098 - 2105
  • [3] A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods
    Sun, Chia-Chi
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (12) : 7745 - 7754
  • [4] Evaluation of renewable energy technologies in Colombia: comparative evaluation using TOPSIS and TOPSIS fuzzy metaheuristic models
    Christian Manuel Moreno Rocha
    Daina Arenas Buelvas
    Energy Informatics, 7 (1)
  • [5] Sensory evaluation of apple ber using fuzzy TOPSIS
    Mathangi, S.
    Maran, J. Prakash
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 45 : 2982 - 2986
  • [6] Dynamic Agent Evaluation Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS
    Zhang, Libo
    Liu, Jiubing
    Huang, Bing
    Li, Huaxiong
    Zhou, Xianzhong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 IEEE 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK IN DESIGN ((CSCWD)), 2018, : 773 - 778
  • [7] SMART Grid Evaluation Using Fuzzy Numbers and TOPSIS
    El Alaoui, Mohamed
    SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS AND CITIES, 2017, 2018, 353
  • [8] Using Fuzzy TOPSIS and Balanced Scorecard for Kaizen Evaluation
    El Dardery, Ola I. S.
    Gomaa, Ismail
    Rayan, Adel R. M.
    Frendy
    Khayat, Ghada El
    Sabry, Sara H.
    BUSINESS SYSTEMS RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2023, 14 (01): : 112 - 130
  • [9] Customer evaluation for order acceptance using a novel class of fuzzy methods based on TOPSIS
    Chamodrakas, I.
    Alexopoulou, N.
    Martakos, D.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) : 7409 - 7415
  • [10] An evaluation of quality goals by using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology
    Tadic, Danijela
    Gumus, Alev Taskin
    Arsovski, Slavko
    Aleksic, Aleksandar
    Stefanovic, Miladin
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2013, 25 (03) : 547 - 556