Choosing the Best Candidates for Penile Rehabilitation after Bilateral Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy

被引:36
作者
Briganti, Alberto [1 ]
Di Trapani, Ettore [1 ]
Abdollah, Firas [1 ]
Gallina, Andrea [1 ]
Suardi, Nazareno [1 ]
Capitanio, Umberto [1 ]
Tutolo, Manuela [1 ]
Passoni, Niccolo [1 ]
Salonia, Andrea [1 ]
DiGirolamo, Valerio [1 ]
Colombo, Renzo [1 ]
Guazzoni, Giorgio [1 ]
Rigatti, Patrizio [1 ]
Montorsi, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Dept Urol, Urol Res Inst, I-20132 Milan, Italy
关键词
Erectile Dysfunction; Radical Prostatectomy; Rehabilitation; Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors; ERECTILE FUNCTION RECOVERY; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; SILDENAFIL CITRATE; VENOOCCLUSIVE DYSFUNCTION; SEXUAL FUNCTION; DOUBLE-BLIND; PREVENTION; RESECTION; POTENCY; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02580.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction. Controversy exists regarding the ideal candidates for penile rehabilitation after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (BNSRP). Aim. To test the effect of penile rehabilitation according to preoperative patient characteristics. Methods. We included 435 consecutive patients treated with BNSRP between 2004 and 2008. Preoperative age, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were used to subdivide patients into three groups according to foreseen risk of erectile dysfunction (ED) after surgery: low (age <= 65, IIEF-erectile function (EF) >= 26, CCI <= 1; N = 184), intermediate (age 66-69 or IIEF-EF 11-25, CCI <= 1; N = 115), and high (age >= 70 or IIEF-EF <= 10 or CCI <= 2; N = 136). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to test the difference in EF recovery rates among patients left untreated after surgery (N = 193), those receiving on-demand phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-I; N = 147), and those treated with chronic use of PDE5-I (taken every day or every other day for 3-6 months; N = 95). The same analyses were repeated within each risk category. Main Outcome Measure. Erectile function (EF) was evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Recovery of EF after BNSRP was defined as an IIEF-EF domain score >= 22. Results. No difference in terms of EF recovery was found between patients receiving on-demand vs. daily PDE5-I (P = 0.09) in the overall population. Similarly, comparable efficacy of the two treatment schedules (on-demand vs. chronic) was demonstrated in patients with low and high risk of ED (all P < 0.8). Conversely, daily therapy with PDE5-I showed significantly higher efficacy for the EF recovery rate compared with the on-demand PDE5-I administration schedule in patients with intermediate risk of ED (3-year EF recovery: 74% vs. 52%, respectively; P = 0.02). Conclusion. The ideal candidates for penile rehabilitation after surgery are patients at intermediate risk of ED. Briganti A, Di Trapani E, Abdollah F, Gallina A, Suardi N, Capitanio U, Tutolo M, Passoni N, Salonia A, DiGirolamo V, Colombo R, Guazzoni G, Rigatti P, and Montorsi F. Choosing the best candidates for penile rehabilitation after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Sex Med 2012;9:608-617.
引用
收藏
页码:608 / 617
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WHO TECH REP SER
[2]   Factors affecting erectile function after radical retropubic prostatectomy: results from 1620 consecutive patients [J].
Ayyathurai, Rajinikanth ;
Manoharan, Murugesan ;
Nieder, Alan M. ;
Kava, Bruce ;
Soloway, Mark S. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 101 (07) :833-836
[3]   Recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy:: improvement with nightly low-dose sildenafil [J].
Bannowsky, Andreas ;
Schulze, Heiko ;
van der Horst, Christof ;
Hautmann, Stefan ;
Juenemann, Kalus-Peter .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 101 (10) :1279-1283
[4]   Predicting Erectile Function Recovery after Bilateral Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy: A Proposal of a Novel Preoperative Risk Stratification [J].
Briganti, Alberto ;
Gallina, Andrea ;
Suardi, Nazareno ;
Capitanio, Umberto ;
Tutolo, Manuela ;
Bianchi, Marco ;
Passoni, Niccolo ;
Salonia, Andrea ;
Colombo, Renzo ;
Di Girolamo, Valerio ;
Guazzoni, Giorgio ;
Rigatti, Patrizio ;
Montorsi, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2010, 7 (07) :2521-2531
[5]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[6]   Age difference between patient and partner is a predictive factor of potency rate following radical prostatectomy [J].
Descazeaud, Aurelien ;
Debre, Bernard ;
Flam, Thierry A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (06) :2594-2598
[7]   Sexual function before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy:: A systematic review of prognostic indicators for a successful outcome [J].
Dubbelman, Yuette D. ;
Dohle, Gert R. ;
Schroder, Frits H. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 50 (04) :711-720
[8]   Predicting an optimal outcome after radical prostatectomy: The trifecta nomogram [J].
Eastham, James A. ;
Scardino, Peter T. ;
Kattan, Michael W. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (06) :2207-2210
[9]   Comparison of stage migration patterns between Europe and the USA: an analysis of 11 350 men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer [J].
Gallina, Andrea ;
Chun, Felix K. -H. ;
Suardi, Nazareno ;
Eastham, James A. ;
Perrotte, Paul ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Hutterer, Georg ;
Huland, Hartwig ;
Klein, Eric A. ;
Reuther, Alwyn ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
Shariat, Shahrokh F. ;
Roehrborn, Claus G. ;
de la Taille, Alexandre ;
Salomon, Laurent ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 101 (12) :1513-1518
[10]   EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clinically Localised Disease [J].
Heidenreich, Axel ;
Bellmunt, Joaquim ;
Bolla, Michel ;
Joniau, Steven ;
Mason, Malcolm ;
Matveev, Vsevolod ;
Mottet, Nicolas ;
Schmid, Hans-Peter ;
van der Kwast, Theo ;
Wiegel, Thomas ;
Zattoni, Filliberto .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (01) :61-71