Management effectiveness and conservation prioritizing the protected areas using RAPPAM methodology (case study: Khuzestan province)

被引:5
作者
Mohseni, Fakhrieh [1 ]
Sabzghabaei, Gholamreza [1 ]
Dashti, Soolmaz [2 ]
机构
[1] Behbahan Khatam Alanbia Univ Technol, Coll Nat Resources & Environm, Dept Environm, Behbahan, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Environm, Ahvaz Branch, Ahvaz, Iran
关键词
PA management; Effectiveness; Iran; RAPPAM; Conservation; Monitoring;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-019-7284-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the world today, where the industrialization of countries is still on the increase, protecting habitats and wildlife will be possible only in protected areas. That is why maintaining species' diversity and preventing the destruction of habitats in protected areas has been of great interest. Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area Management methodology is one of the most common methods of management effectiveness assessment and is used as a tool for managers and decision-makers of protected areas. Recently, the biodiversity and sustainability of wildlife populations, as well as preserving the integrity of protected areas in the Khuzestan province, have been at risk due to several factors; therefore, the evaluation of management effectiveness in these areas is necessary. The studied areas in this research are protected areas in Khuzestan province, with a history of more than 5years of management. The results of this study show that Dez, a protected area with the highest points in the planning (38.5), has the highest score in management effectiveness (128.78). Also, Shimbar, a protected area with the lowest score (11), has the lowest score of management effectiveness (64.66) among the other areas. The overall management level of the protected areas in the Khuzestan province is at the low-intermediate managerial level compared to the global average. Therefore, it is necessary to change the policies and management of these areas.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Are we missing the boat? Current uses of long-term biological monitoring data in the evaluation and management of marine protected areas [J].
Addison, P. F. E. ;
Flander, L. B. ;
Cook, C. N. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 149 :148-156
[2]  
Albodvirej H, 1994, INFORM KARKHE PROTEC
[3]  
Albodvirej H, 1994, INFORM DEZ PROTECTED
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, BOOKL ANN REP PROT A
[5]  
[Anonymous], BHUTAN MANAGEMENT EF
[6]   Management effectiveness of a large marine protected area in Northeastern Brazil [J].
Araujo, Julio Lustosa ;
Bernard, Enrico .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 130 :43-49
[7]  
Arha K., 2011, The endangered species act and federalism: Effective conservation through greater state commitment, P251
[8]  
Batsukh N, 2005, MONGOLIA MANAGEMENT
[9]   Analysis of deforestation and protected area effectiveness in Indonesia: A comparison of Bayesian spatial models [J].
Brun, Cyrille ;
Cook, Alex R. ;
Lee, Janice Ser Huay ;
Wich, Serge A. ;
Koh, Lian Pin ;
Carrasco, Luis R. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2015, 31 :285-295
[10]   Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity [J].
Bruner, AG ;
Gullison, RE ;
Rice, RE ;
da Fonseca, GAB .
SCIENCE, 2001, 291 (5501) :125-128