A combined multi-criteria approach to support FMECA analyses: A real-world case

被引:156
作者
Carpitella, Silvia [1 ]
Certa, Antonella [1 ]
Izquierdo, Joaquin [2 ]
La Fata, Concetta Manuela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Palermo, DIID, Palermo, Italy
[2] Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Matemat Multidisciplinar, Valencia, Spain
关键词
Safety-critical analysis; FMECA; FTOPSIS; AHP; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; FAILURE MODE; RISK-EVALUATION; TOPSIS; AHP; SYSTEM; MAINTENANCE; SELECTION; OPTIMIZATION; AGGREGATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.017
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The paper proposes an approach that combines reliability analyses and multi-criteria decision methods to optimize maintenance activities of complex systems. A failure mode, effects, and criticality analysts (FMECA) is initially performed and the fuzzy TOPSIS (FTOPSIS) method is then applied to rank previously identified failure modes. For prioritization, failure modes are assessed against three evaluation criteria that differ from those traditionally involved in risk priority number (RPN) computation (i.e. severity, occurrence and detection). Two criteria refer to the maintenance management reflecting the operational time taken by the maintenance activity performed after the occurrence of a specific fault, and the way such an action is executed. The third criterion reflects the classical frequency of the occurrence of faults. To further develop previous research, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is herein applied to weight evaluation criteria and a group of experts is involved with aspects associated with the considered criteria. The approach is applied to a real-world case study, showing that the obtained results represent a significant driver in planning maintenance activities. To test the influence of criteria weights on ranking results, a sensitivity analysis is carried out by varying the vector of criteria weights obtained from the group decision process. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 402
页数:9
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Clean Agent Selection Approached by Fuzzy TOPSIS Decision-Making Method [J].
Aiello, Giuseppe ;
Enea, Mario ;
Galante, Giacomo ;
La Scalia, Giada .
FIRE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 45 (04) :405-418
[2]  
[Anonymous], P 22 ISSAT INT C REL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, IJAER
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 60812 EN
[5]   ELECTRE TRI-based approach to the failure modes classification on the basis of risk parameters: An alternative to the risk priority number [J].
Antonella, Certa ;
Mario, Enea ;
Maria, Galante Giacomo ;
Manuela, La Fata Concetta .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 108 :100-110
[6]   System reliability as perceived by maintenance personnel on petroleum production facilities [J].
Antonovsky, A. ;
Pollock, C. ;
Straker, L. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2016, 152 :58-65
[7]   Supplementing quantitative risk assessments with a stage addressing the risk understanding of the decision maker [J].
Aven, Terje .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2016, 152 :51-57
[8]   Consistent completion of incomplete judgments in decision making using AHP [J].
Benitez, J. ;
Delgado-Galvan, X. ;
Izquierdo, J. ;
Perez-Garcia, R. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2015, 290 :412-422
[9]   A simple formula to find the closest consistent matrix to a reciprocal matrix [J].
Benitez, J. ;
Izquierdo, J. ;
Perez-Garcia, R. ;
Ramos-Martinez, E. .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2014, 38 (15-16) :3968-3974
[10]   Improving consistency in AHP decision-making processes [J].
Benitez, J. ;
Delgado-Galvan, X. ;
Izquierdo, J. ;
Perez-Garcia, R. .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2012, 219 (05) :2432-2441