Holmium:: YAG lasertripsy with semirigid ureterorenoscope for upper-ureteral stones >2 cm

被引:24
作者
Chen, CS [1 ]
Wu, CF [1 ]
Shee, JJ [1 ]
Lin, WY [1 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Chiayi, Taiwan
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2005.19.780
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: Shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) has a variable but low success rate for impacted stones of the upper ureter. Ureterorenoscopic stone manipulation is another option, the appropriateness of which decreases with increasing size of the stone. This report examines the feasibility and effectiveness of ureterorenoscopic holmium:YAG lasertripsy (URSL) for impacted upper-ureteral stone > 2 cm. Patients and Methods: Twenty-six patients with impacted upper-ureteral stones > 2 cm were treated with URSL using a 6/7.5F. semirigid tapered ureterorenoscope and holmium:YAG laser under spinal anesthesia. Double-J ureteral stents were placed in all patients owing to the large stone burden and edema of the intraluminal mucosa. Success was defined as stone-free status on radiography at 1 month. Demographics, stone parameters, and outcomes were analyzed. Results: The retrograde accessibility rate of these stones was 96.2% (25 of 26). The stone-free rate achieved after one sitting was 84% (21 of 25). After an auxiliary treatment, the total stone free-rate reached 100%. In only one patient, who had a sharply angulated ureter, did access with the ureterorenoscope fail; this patient received open surgery. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Conclusions: Although 16% of patients need an auxiliary treatment, the holmium:YAG laser combined with a semirigid ureterorenoscope can be considered the first choice for large impacted upper-ureteral stones.
引用
收藏
页码:780 / 784
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Chen C S, 1999, Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi, V22, P259
[2]   Is ureteral stenting necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy? A prospective, randomized controlled trial [J].
Chen, YT ;
Chen, J ;
Wong, WY ;
Yang, SSD ;
Hsieh, CH ;
Wang, CC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (05) :1977-1980
[3]   Outpatient holmium laser lithotripsy using semirigid ureteroscope - Is the treatment outcome affected by stone load? [J].
Cheung, MC ;
Lee, F ;
Yip, SKH ;
Tam, PC .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 39 (06) :702-708
[4]  
DAUNSER H, 1993, J UROLOGY, V150, P824
[5]   AN ALGORITHM FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF URETERAL CALCULI [J].
DRETLER, SP ;
KEATING, MA ;
RILEY, J .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 136 (06) :1190-1193
[6]  
Dushinski J W, 1997, Tech Urol, V3, P60
[7]   Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor staghorn calculi [J].
Grasso, M ;
Conlin, M ;
Bagley, D .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (02) :346-351
[8]   THE CASE FOR PRIMARY ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF UPPER URINARY-TRACT CALCULI .2. COST AND OUTCOME ASSESSMENT OF 112 PRIMARY URETERAL CALCULI [J].
GRASSO, M ;
BEAGHLER, M ;
LOISIDES, P .
UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (03) :372-376
[9]   Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study [J].
Hendrikx, AJM ;
Strijbos, WEM ;
De Knijff, DW ;
Kums, JJM ;
Doesburg, WH ;
Lemmens, WAJG .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1999, 13 (10) :727-733
[10]   ELECTROHYDRAULIC VERSUS PNEUMATIC DISINTEGRATION IN THE TREATMENT OF URETERAL STONES - A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE TRIAL [J].
HOFBAUER, J ;
HOBARTH, K ;
MARBERGER, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (03) :623-625