Metacognitive scaffolding in an innovative learning arrangement

被引:58
作者
Molenaar, Inge [1 ]
van Boxtel, Carla A. M. [1 ]
Sleegers, Peter J. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Res Inst Child Dev & Educ, NL-1090 GE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Dept Educ Org & Management, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Metacognition; Scaffolding; Innovative learning arrangements; Virtual agents; Elementary education; STUDENTS; ENVIRONMENT; INSTRUCTION; REFLECT; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1007/s11251-010-9154-1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study examined the effects of metacognitive scaffolds on learning outcomes of collaborating students in an innovative learning arrangement. The triads were supported by computerized scaffolds, which were dynamically integrated into the learning process and took a structuring or problematizing form. In an experimental design the two experimental groups receiving scaffolds were compared with a control group. The experimental groups differed in the form of scaffolding used: structuring scaffolds versus problematizing scaffolds. We analyzed the effects of metacognitive scaffolding and of different forms of scaffolds on the learning outcomes at group and individual level. The results showed no effect of scaffolding on group performance, nor on the acquired individual domain knowledge, but a small effect on acquired individual metacognitive knowledge. With respect to the effects of different forms of scaffolds, we found a small effect on group performance, on transfer of individual domain knowledge and on the individual metacognitive knowledge acquired.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 803
页数:19
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, METAANALYTIC PROCEDU, DOI DOI 10.2307/1175262
[2]   Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition - Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds [J].
Azevedo, R ;
Hadwin, AF .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2005, 33 (5-6) :367-379
[3]   Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia? [J].
Azevedo, R ;
Cromley, JG .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 96 (03) :523-535
[4]   Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? [J].
Azevedo, Roger ;
Moos, Daniel C. ;
Greene, Jeffrey A. ;
Winters, Fielding I. ;
Crornley, Jennifer G. .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 56 (01) :45-72
[5]  
Bannert M., 2006, Journal of Educational Computing Research, V35, P359, DOI 10.2190/94V6-R58H-3367-G388
[6]   Effects of a metacognitive support device in learning environments [J].
Bannert, Maria ;
Hildebrand, Melanie ;
Mengelkamp, Christoph .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2009, 25 (04) :829-835
[7]   Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalisation method affect learning? [J].
Bannert, Maria ;
Mengelkamp, Christoph .
METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2008, 3 (01) :39-58
[8]   EXPERT PERFORMANCE - ITS STRUCTURE AND ACQUISITION [J].
ERICSSON, KA ;
CHARNESS, N .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1994, 49 (08) :725-747
[9]   META-COGNITION AND COGNITIVE MONITORING - NEW AREA OF COGNITIVE-DEVELOPMENTAL INQUIRY [J].
FLAVELL, JH .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1979, 34 (10) :906-911
[10]   HAWTHORNE EXPERIMENTS - 1ST STATISTICAL INTERPRETATION [J].
FRANKE, RH ;
KAUL, JD .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1978, 43 (05) :623-643