Robotic Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Excision of Rectal Neoplasia: Clinical Experience With 58 Consecutive Patients

被引:46
作者
Tomassi, Marco J. [1 ]
Taller, Janos [1 ]
Yuhan, Robert [2 ]
Ruan, Joseph H. [2 ]
Klaristenfeld, Daniel D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente, Dept Gen Surg, San Diego, CA USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente, Dept Colorectal Surg, Fontana, CA USA
关键词
da Vinci robotic surgery; Rectal cancer; Rectal polyp; Transanal excision; Transanal minimally invasive surgery; ENDOSCOPIC MICROSURGERY; LOCAL EXCISION; CANCER; OUTCOMES; MULTICENTER; ERGONOMICS; RESECTION; STANDARD; TAMIS;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000001223
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Given the significant perioperative risks and costs of total mesorectal excision, minimally invasive transanal surgical approaches have grown in popularity for early rectal cancer and rectal polyps. This article discusses a transanal robotic surgery technique to perform full-thickness resections of benign and malignant rectal neoplasms. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe an initial experience with robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a high-volume colorectal surgery practice with a large health maintenance organization. PATIENTS: Patients at Southern California Kaiser Permanente with early rectal cancer and rectal polyps amenable to transanal excision were included. INTERVENTIONS: Transanal resection of rectal tumors were removed using robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Local recurrence of rectal pathology was measured. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients underwent robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery with full-thickness rectal resection by 4 surgeons for the following indications: rectal cancer (n = 28), rectal polyp (n = 18), rectal carcinoid (n = 11), and rectal GI stromal tumor (n = 1). Mean operative time was 66.2 minutes (range, 17-180 min). The mean tumor height from the anal verge was 8.8 cm (range, 4-14 cm), and the mean specimen size was 3.3 cm (range, 1.3-8.2 cm). A total of 57 (98.3%) of 58 specimens were intact, and 55 (94.8%) of 58 specimens had negative surgical margins. At a mean follow-up of 11.5 months (range, 0.3-33.3 mo), 3 patients (5.5%) developed local recurrences, and all underwent successful salvage surgery. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by being a retrospective, nonrandomized trial with short follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery is a safe, oncologically effective surgical approach for rectal polyps and early rectal cancers. It offers the oncologic benefits and perioperative complication profile of other transanal minimally invasive surgical approaches but also enhances surgeon ergonomics and provides an efficient transanal rectal platform. See Video Abstract at http:// links.lww.com/DCR/A759.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 285
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) for Local Excision of Benign Neoplasms and Early-stage Rectal Cancer: Efficacy and Outcomes in the First 50 Patients [J].
Albert, Matthew R. ;
Atallah, Sam B. ;
deBeche-Adams, Teresa C. ;
Izfar, Seema ;
Larach, Sergio W. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (03) :301-307
[2]   Robotic transanal surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasia, transanal total mesorectal excision, and repair of complex fistulae: clinical experience with the first 18 cases at a single institution [J].
Atallah, S. ;
Martin-Perez, B. ;
Parra-Davila, E. ;
deBeche-Adams, T. ;
Nassif, G. ;
Albert, M. ;
Larach, S. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2015, 19 (07) :401-410
[3]   Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery in a cadaveric model [J].
Atallah, S. B. ;
Albert, M. R. ;
deBeche-Adams, T. H. ;
Larach, S. W. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2011, 15 (04) :461-464
[4]   Robotic Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery: Technical Details for the Lateral Approach [J].
Buchs, Nicolas C. ;
Pugin, Francois ;
Volonte, Francesco ;
Hagen, Monika E. ;
Morel, Philippe ;
Ris, Frederic .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (10) :1194-1198
[5]  
Buess G, 1991, Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd, P441
[6]   Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Versus Standard Transanal Excision for the Removal of Rectal Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Clancy, Cillian ;
Burke, John P. ;
Albert, Mathew R. ;
O'Connell, P. Ronan ;
Winter, Desmond C. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2015, 58 (02) :254-261
[7]  
Dietz D.W., 2007, The ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery, P141, DOI [10.1007/978-0-387-36374-5_10, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-36374-5_10]
[8]   Development of a virtual reality robotic surgical curriculum using the da Vinci Si surgical system [J].
Gomez, Pedro Pablo ;
Willis, Ross E. ;
Van Sickle, Kent R. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (08) :2171-2179
[9]   Local excision of distal rectal cancer: An update of Cancer and Leukemia Group B 8984 - Reply [J].
Bleday, Ronald ;
Greenberg, Jacob A. ;
Mayer, Robert ;
Shibata, David ;
Herndon, James E., II ;
Steele, Glenn D., Jr. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008, 51 (08) :1193-1194
[10]   Low rectal cancer - Impact of radiation and chemotherapy on surgical treatment [J].
Habr-Gama, A ;
de Souza, PMSB ;
Ribeiro, U ;
Nadalin, W ;
Gansl, R ;
Sousa, AHSE ;
Campos, FG ;
Gama-Rodrigues, J .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1998, 41 (09) :1087-1096