Ilizarov bone transport versus fibular graft for reconstruction of tibial bone defects in children

被引:20
作者
Abdelkhalek, Mostafa [1 ]
El-Alfy, Barakat [1 ]
Ali, Ayman M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Mansoura 3115, Egypt
来源
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B | 2016年 / 25卷 / 06期
关键词
fibular graft; Ilizarov; tibial defect; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/BPB.0000000000000334
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare the results of treatment of segmental tibial defects in the pediatric age group using an Ilizarov external fixator versus a nonvascularized fibular bone graft. This study included 24 patients (age range from 5.5 to 15 years) with tibial bone defects: 13 patients were treated with bone transport (BT) and 11 patients were treated with a nonvascularized fibular graft (FG). The outcome parameters were bone results (union, deformity, infection, leg-length discrepancy) and functional results: external fixation index and external fixation time. In group A (BT), one patient developed refracture at the regenerate site, whereas, in group B (FG), after removal of the external fixator, one of the FGs developed a stress fracture. The external fixator time in group A was 10.7 months (range 8-14.5) versus 7.8 months (range 4-11.5 months) in group B (FG). In group A (BT), one patient had a limb-length discrepancy (LLD), whereas, in group B (FG), three patients had LLD. The functional and bone results of the Ilizarov BT technique were excellent in 23.1 and 30.8%, good in 38.5 and 46.2, fair in 30.8 and 15.4, and poor in 7.6 and 7.6%, respectively. The poor functional result was related to the poor bone result because of prolonged external fixator time resulting in significant pain, limited ankle motion, whereas the functional and bone results of fibular grafting were excellent in 9.1 and 18.2%, good in 63.6 and 45.5%, fair in 18.2 and 27.2%, and poor in 9.1 and 9.1%, respectively. Segmental tibial defects can be effectively treated with both methods. The FG method provides satisfactory results, with early removal of the external fixator. However, it had a limitation in patients with severe infection and those with LLD. Also, it requires a long duration of limb bracing until adequate hypertrophy of the graft. The Ilizarov method has the advantages of early weight bearing, treatment of postinfection bone defect in a one-stage surgery, and the possibility to treat the associated LLD. However, it has a long external fixation time. Copyright (C) 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 560
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   War-related infected tibial nonunion with bone and soft-tissue loss treated with bone transport using the Ilizarov method [J].
Bumbasirevic, Marko ;
Tomic, Slavko ;
Lesic, Aleksandar ;
Milosevic, Ivan ;
Atkinson, Henry Dushan E. .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2010, 130 (06) :739-749
[42]   Stability of tibial defect reconstruction with fibular graft and unilateral external fixation: a finite element study [J].
Chen, Huiqiang ;
Zhang, Ying ;
Xia, Hong ;
Wang, Fei ;
Li, Zhibo ;
Chen, Xuxiang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2014, 7 (01) :76-83
[43]   Ipsilateral fibula transport for the treatment of massive tibial bone defects [J].
Yin, Peng ;
Zhang, Lihai ;
Li, Tongtong ;
Xie, Yong ;
Li, Jiantao ;
Li, Zhirui ;
Liu, Jianheng ;
Zhang, Lining ;
Zhang, Qun ;
Tang, Peifu .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2015, 46 (11) :2273-2277
[44]   Bone transport techniques in posttraumatic bone defects [J].
Rigal, S. ;
Merloz, P. ;
Le Nen, D. ;
Mathevon, H. ;
Masquelet, A. -C. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2012, 98 (01) :103-108
[45]   Bone transport for limb reconstruction following severe tibial fractures [J].
Fuermetz, Julian ;
Soo, Chris ;
Behrendt, Wolf ;
Thaller, Peter H. ;
Siekmann, Holger ;
Boehme, Joerg ;
Josten, Christoph .
ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2016, 8 (01) :28-32
[46]   The treatment of infected tibial nonunion by bone transport using the Ilizarov external fixator and a systematic review of infected tibial nonunion treated by Ilizarov methods [J].
Yin, Peng ;
Zhang, Qun ;
Mao, Zhi ;
Li, Tongtong ;
Zhang, Lihai ;
Tang, Peifu .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2014, 80 (03) :426-435
[47]   Treatment of large posttraumatic tibial bone defects using the Ilizarov method: a subjective outcome assessment [J].
Krappinger, Dietmar ;
Irenberger, Alexander ;
Zegg, Michael ;
Huber, Burkhart .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2013, 133 (06) :789-795
[48]   Massive Tibial Bone Regeneration with Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cells using Ilizarov Bone Transport: A Case Report [J].
Saw, K. Y. ;
Gill, R. ;
Low, T. C. .
MALAYSIAN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL, 2020, 14 (03) :166-169
[49]   Treatment of Large Femoral and Tibial Bone Defects With Plate-Assisted Bone Segment Transport [J].
Freischmidt, Holger ;
Guehring, Thorsten ;
Thome, Patrick ;
Armbruster, Jonas ;
Reiter, Gregor ;
Gruetzner, Paul Alfred ;
Nolte, Philip-Christian .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2024, 38 (05) :285-290
[50]   Reconstruction of Intercalary Bone Defects After Tumour Resection with the Use of a Free Vascularised Fibular Graft: the Concealed Advantages of the External Fixator [J].
Charles, Tatiana ;
Schuind, Frederic ;
Gkotsi, Antonia ;
Gebhart, Michael ;
Jayankura, Marc .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (SUPPL 1) :119-126