Cost-effectiveness of orlistat for the treatment of overweight and obese patients in Ireland

被引:35
作者
Lacey, LA
Wolf, A
O'Shea, D
Erny, S
Ruof, J
机构
[1] Lacey Solut Ltd, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Evaluat Sci, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[3] St Columcilles & St Vincents Univ, Dept Endocrinol, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Roche Pharmaceut, Global Hlth Econ, Basel, Switzerland
[5] Hannover Med Sch, Ctr Internal Med, Div Rheumatol, Hlth Serv Res Unit, D-3000 Hannover, Germany
关键词
orlistat; weight loss; cost-effectiveness; Ireland;
D O I
10.1038/sj.ijo.0802947
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of orlistat plus a calorie-controlled diet compared with a calorie-controlled diet alone for the treatment of overweight and obese patients in Ireland. DESIGN: Economic modelling techniques using published international efficacy data and Irish cost data were used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of orlistat in obese patients when only responders to treatment (ie achieve 5% weight loss after 3 months of treatment) continue orlistat after 3 months. The model incorporated known relationships between weight loss and quality of life (utility) gain, and weight loss and reduction in risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) to predict the impact of weight loss on quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs) gained and on the onset of T2DM. The costs associated with each treatment arm included the acquisition cost of orlistat, cost of a calorie-controlled dietary programme and monitoring and treatment costs associated with T2DM. An Irish health-care perspective was taken for the analysis, based on 2003 costs. SUBJECTS: Weight loss data on 1386 patients from five pivotal orlistat clinical trials with at least 12 months duration were pooled (two American and three primarily European studies). All the studies were randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentre trials with a similar design. The inclusion criteria were BMI >= 28 kg/m(2), age >= 18 y, no diagnosed T2DM and the ability to lose 2.5 kg in weight during the introductory period. MEASUREMENTS: Cost effectiveness was modelled from these data and presented as incremental cost per QALY. RESULTS: When orlistat treatment plus a calorie-controlled diet was compared with a calorie-controlled diet alone, the incremental cost per year was 478 Euro. The number needed to treat (NNT) to gain one QALY was estimated to be 35. The incremental cost per QALY gained was within the range considered cost-effective at 16954 Euro. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated an incremental cost per QALY of 11000-35000 Euro under a variety of assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: Our model suggests that orlistat is effective and cost-effective in obese patients, if after 3 months of treatment, only treatment responders continue treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:975 / 982
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[11]   Impact of overweight on the risk of developing common chronic diseases during a 10-year period [J].
Field, AE ;
Coakley, EH ;
Spadano, JL ;
Laird, N ;
Dietz, WH ;
Rimm, E ;
Colditz, GA .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 161 (13) :1581-1586
[12]   One-year treatment of obesity: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study of orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor [J].
Finer, N ;
James, WPT ;
Kopelman, PG ;
Lean, MEJ ;
Williams, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2000, 24 (03) :306-313
[13]  
Fontaine KR, 1996, J FAM PRACTICE, V43, P265
[14]  
Fontaine KR, 2000, INT J EAT DISORDER, V27, P101, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(200001)27:1&lt
[15]  
101::AID-EAT12&gt
[16]  
3.0.CO
[17]  
2-D
[18]   Estimating the effect of changes in body mass index on health state preferences [J].
Hakim, Z ;
Wolf, A ;
Garrison, LP .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2002, 20 (06) :393-404
[19]   Quality of life in relation to overweight and body fat distribution [J].
Han, TS ;
Tijhuis, MAR ;
Lean, MEJ ;
Seidell, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1998, 88 (12) :1814-1820
[20]   Orlistat in the long-term treatment of obesity in primary care settings [J].
Hauptman, J ;
Lucas, C ;
Boldrin, MN ;
Collins, H ;
Segal, KR .
ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2000, 9 (02) :160-167