A review on cost-effectiveness analysis of agri-environmental measures related to the EU WFD: Key issues, methods, and applications

被引:102
作者
Balana, Bedru Babulo [1 ]
Vinten, Andy [1 ]
Slee, Bill [1 ]
机构
[1] Macaulay Land Use Res Inst, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland
关键词
Water Framework Directive; Cost-effectiveness; Economic analysis; Water quality; Agri-environmental measures; Diffuse pollution; IMPROVE WATER-QUALITY; POLLUTION-CONTROL; LAND RETIREMENT; MANAGEMENT; NITROGEN; RIVER; AGRICULTURE; NUTRIENT; MODEL; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.020
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The European Water Framework Directive (WFD) explicitly integrates economics into water management and water policy in Europe. Specifically, Article 11 and Annex Ill of the Directive call for a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of alternative mitigation measures as a requirement in formulating Programme of Measures (PoMs) to achieve 'good ecological status' for all waters in Europe. As agriculture is supposed to be the major contributor to diffuse water pollution, CEA of agri-environmental measures has been given paramount importance in establishing the PoMs. This paper summarises the status, significance, and methodological limitations of WFD-related CEA studies in Europe. Cases from the United Kingdom, countries surrounding the Baltic Sea and central and southern Europe were included in the review. Review results indicate that most WFD-related CEA studies: (1) were based on models of 'representative' farms without capturing the variability among real-world farms; (2) concentrate on a single ecological effect of measures or are based on cost estimates of the sectors directly involved in the pollutant-reduction programme (i.e., co-benefits, trade-offs, and external costs were not examined); and (3) did not incorporate uncertainties in both cost and effectiveness estimates. Based on the review results, the paper suggests policy implications and recommendations for future research in the field. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1021 / 1031
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Ancev T., 2008, 13 WORLD WAT C 1 4 S
[2]  
Anthony S., 2005, COST DP COST EFFECTI
[3]  
Anthony S., 2006, COST EFFECTIVENESS P
[4]   COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE AIR QUALITY-CONTROL STRATEGIES [J].
ATKINSON, SE ;
LEWIS, DH .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1974, 1 (03) :237-250
[5]   Optimizing the riparian buffer: Harold Brook in the Skaneateles Lake watershed, New York [J].
Azzaino, Z ;
Conrad, JM ;
Ferraro, PJ .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2002, 78 (04) :501-514
[6]   The impact of water and agriculture policy scenarios on irrigated farming systems in Italy: An analysis based on farm level multi-attribute linear programming models [J].
Bartolini, F. ;
Bazzani, G. M. ;
Gallerani, V. ;
Raggi, M. ;
Viaggi, D. .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2007, 93 (1-3) :90-114
[7]   Bayesian belief networks as a meta-modelling tool in integrated river basin management - Pros and cons in evaluating nutrient abatement decisions under uncertainty in a Norwegian river basin [J].
Barton, D. N. ;
Saloranta, T. ;
Moe, S. J. ;
Eggestad, H. O. ;
Kuikka, S. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 66 (01) :91-104
[8]  
Bateman I.J., 2008, 0703 CSERGE ECM
[9]   Economic impact of alternative policy responses to prolonged and severe drought in the Rio Grande Basin [J].
Booker, JF ;
Michelsen, AM ;
Ward, FA .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2005, 41 (02) :1-15
[10]   The relative cost-efficiency of arable nitrogen management in Sweden [J].
Brady, M .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 47 (01) :53-70