The contribution of group prenatal care to maternal psychological health outcomes: A systematic review

被引:15
作者
Buultjens, Melissa [1 ]
Farouque, Ambereen [1 ]
Karimi, Leila [1 ]
Whitby, Linda [4 ]
Milgrom, Jeannette [2 ,3 ]
Erbas, Bircan [1 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Sch Psychol & Publ Hlth, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
[2] Parent Infant Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Psychol Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Univ Lib Res, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
关键词
Group pregnancy care; Perinatal; Depression; Anxiety; Stress; Group prenatal care; Randomized controlled trial; Observational study; ANTENATAL CARE; CENTERING PREGNANCY; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; SOCIAL SUPPORT; BIRTH-WEIGHT; DEPRESSION; WOMEN; RISK; PREVALENCE; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.wombi.2020.12.004
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Problem: Poor mental health remains a significant cause of morbidity for childbearing women globally. Background: Group care has been shown to be effective in reducing select clinical outcomes, e.g., the rate of preterm birth, but less is known about the effect of Group Prenatal Care (GPC) on mental health outcomes of stress, depression and anxiety in pregnant women. Aim: To conduct a systematic review of the current evidence of the effect of group pregnancy care on mental health and wellbeing outcomes (i.e., stress, depression and/or anxiety) in childbearing women. Methods: A comprehensive search of published studies in Medline, PsychInfo, CINAHL, ProQuest databases, ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar. Databases were systematically searched without publication period restriction until Feb 2020. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (including quasi-experimental) and observational studies comparing group care with standard pregnancy care. Included were studies published in English, whose primary outcome measures were stress, depression and/or anxiety. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, five randomized controlled trials and four observational studies, involving 1585 women (39%) in GPC and 2456 women (61%) in standard (individual) pregnancy care. Although evidence is limited, where targeted education was integrated into the group pregnancy care model, significant reductions in depressive symptoms were observed. In addition, secondary analysis across several studies identified a subset of GPC women, i.e., higher risk for psychological symptoms, who reported a decrease in their depression, stress and anxiety symptoms, postpartum. Due to the diversity of group care structure and content and the lack of outcomes measures universally reported, a comprehensive meta-analysis could not be performed. Conclusion: The evidence suggests improvements in some markers of psychological health outcomes with group pregnancy care. Future research should involve larger well-designed studies encompassing cross-population data using a validated scale that is comparable across diverse childbearing populations and clinical settings to better understand the impact of group pregnancy care. (c) 2020 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E631 / E642
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Maternal Perinatal Mental Health Outcomes: a Systematic Review
    Zhenrong Shi
    Angus MacBeth
    Mindfulness, 2017, 8 : 823 - 847
  • [22] Moral injury and mental health outcomes in nurses: A systematic review
    Anastasi, Giuliano
    Gravante, Francesco
    Barbato, Paola
    Bambi, Stefano
    Stievano, Alessandro
    Latina, Roberto
    NURSING ETHICS, 2025, 32 (03) : 698 - 723
  • [23] Evaluating group psychological interventions for mental health in women with infertility undertaking fertility treatment: A systematic review and meta-Analysis
    Warne, Emma
    Oxlad, Melissa
    Best, Talitha
    HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2023, 17 (03) : 377 - 401
  • [24] Assessing the psychological effects of prenatal screening tests for maternal and foetal conditions: a systematic review
    Harris, James Matthew
    Franck, Linda
    Michie, Susan
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 30 (03) : 222 - 246
  • [25] Associations between maternal prenatal cortisol concentrations and child outcomes: A systematic review
    Zijlmans, Maartje A. C.
    Riksen-Walraven, J. Marianne
    de Weerth, Carolina
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2015, 53 : 1 - 24
  • [26] Factors Associated With Psychological Distress in Health-Care Workers During an Infectious Disease Outbreak: A Rapid Systematic Review of the Evidence
    Sirois, Fuschia M.
    Owens, Janine
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 11
  • [27] Vegetarianism and veganism compared with mental health and cognitive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Iguacel, Isabel
    Huybrechts, Inge
    Moreno, Luis A.
    Michels, Nathalie
    NUTRITION REVIEWS, 2021, 79 (04) : 361 - 381
  • [28] Music interventions for psychological and physical outcomes in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Jun-Mei
    Wang, Pu
    Yao, Jia-xin
    Zhao, Lei
    Davis, Mellar P.
    Walsh, Declan
    Yue, Guang H.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2012, 20 (12) : 3043 - 3053
  • [29] Psychological Outcomes and Quality of Life in Relation to Pancreatectomy A Systematic Review
    Lounis, Lena
    Aurran-Schleinitz, Therese
    Turrini, Olivier
    Delpero, Jean-Robert
    Brejard, Vincent
    PANCREAS, 2019, 48 (04) : 471 - 479
  • [30] Complex Mental Health Sequelae of Psychological Trauma Among Women in Prenatal Care
    Seng, Julia S.
    D'Andrea, Wendy
    Ford, Julian D.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA-THEORY RESEARCH PRACTICE AND POLICY, 2014, 6 (01) : 41 - 49