Are gloves sufficiently protective when hairdressers are exposed to permanent hair dyes? An in vivo study

被引：19

作者：

Antelmi, Annarita ^{[1
,2
]}

Young, Ewa ^{[1
]}

Svedman, Cecilia ^{[1
]}

Zimerson, Erik ^{[1
]}

Engfeldt, Malin ^{[1
]}

Foti, Caterina ^{[2
]}

Bruze, Magnus ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Occupat & Environm Dermatol, SE-20502 Malmo, Sweden

[2] Univ Bari, Unit Dermatol, Dept Biomed Sci & Human Oncol, I-70124 Bari, Italy

来源：

CONTACT DERMATITIS | 2015年 / 72卷 / 04期

关键词：

hairdressers; permanent hair dyes; p-phenylenediamine; protective gloves; P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE; CONTACT ALLERGY; WET WORK; DERMATITIS;

D O I：

10.1111/cod.12320

中图分类号：

R392 [医学免疫学];

学科分类号：

100102 ;

摘要：

Background. The use of permanent hair dyes exposes hairdressers to contact allergens such as p-phenylenediamine (PPD), and the preventive measures are insufficient. Objectives. To perform an in vivo test to study the protective effect of gloves commonly used by hairdressers. Patients/materials/methods. Six gloves from Sweden, Italy and Germany were studied: two vinyl, one natural rubber latex, two nitrile, and one polyethylene. The hair dye used for the provocation was a dark shade permanent dye containing PPD. The dye was mixed with hydrogen peroxide, and 8 PPD-sensitized volunteers were tested with the gloves as a membrane between the hair dye and the skin in a cylindrical open chamber system. Three exposure times (15, 30 and 60 min) were used. Results. Eczematous reactions were found when natural rubber latex, polyethylene and vinyl gloves were tested with the dye. The nitrile gloves gave good protection, even after 60 min of exposure to the hair dye. Conclusions. Many protective gloves used by hairdressers are unsuitable for protection against the risk of elicitation of allergic contact dermatitis caused by PPD.

引用

页码：229 / 236

页数：8

共 23 条

[1] In vivo testing of the protective efficacy of gloves against allergen-containing products using an open chamber system [J].