Value of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxygluclose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of recurrent colorectal cancer

被引:0
作者
Hung, GU
Shiau, YC
Tsai, SC
Chao, TH
Ho, YJ
Kao, CK
机构
[1] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
[2] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Div Colorectal Surg, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
[3] Far Eastern Mem Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Tainan, Taiwan
[4] Show Chwan Mem Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Chunghua, Taiwan
[5] Jen Ai Hosp, Dept Radiol, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission; tomography; recurrent colorectal cancer;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To evaluate the clinical value of positron emission tomagraphy (PET) with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) in recurrent colorectal cancer, the records of 33 patients who underwent 34 FDG-PET scans were reviewed and compared with computed tomography (CT) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The final diagnosis was based on operative, histopathological findings or clinical follow-up >1 year. FDG PET detected all 15 patients with recurrent diseases (9 local recurrences, 4 lymphatic metastases, 2 hepatic metastases and 8 pulmonary metastases) and I primary lung cancer However; there were 3 false positive cases. The overall sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET were 100% and 83%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of CEA were 33% and 86%, respectively for detecting recurrent coloectal cancer Abdominal CT had a sensitivity and specificity of 78% and 61% for detecting local recurrence and detected one lymphatic and one hepatic metastasis. In conclusion, the FDG-PET was more accurate than CT and CEA for the detection of recurrent colorectal cancel: In addition it accurately detected distant metastases or occult secondary malignancy and may affect clinical management.
引用
收藏
页码:1375 / 1378
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE OF HUMAN COLORECTAL-CANCER METASTASIS [J].
AUGUST, DA ;
OTTOW, RT ;
SUGARBAKER, PH .
CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 1984, 3 (04) :303-324
[2]  
DAHLBOM M, 1992, J NUCL MED, V33, P1191
[3]  
HABERKORN U, 1991, J NUCL MED, V32, P1485
[4]  
KELLY CJ, 1992, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V70, P1397, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19920901)70:3+<1397::AID-CNCR2820701531>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-A
[6]   Evaluation of pulmonary lesions with FDG-PET - Comparison of findings in patients with and without a history of prior malignancy [J].
Knight, SB ;
Delbeke, D ;
Stewart, JR ;
Sandler, MP ;
Ebers, T .
CHEST, 1996, 109 (04) :982-988
[7]   Elimination of artifactual accumulation of FDG in PET imaging of colorectal cancer [J].
Miraldi, F ;
Vesselle, H ;
Faulhaber, PF ;
Adler, LP ;
Leisure, GP .
CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1998, 23 (01) :3-7
[8]   AN EVALUATION OF THE CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN (CEA) TEST FOR MONITORING PATIENTS WITH RESECTED COLON-CANCER [J].
MOERTEL, CG ;
FLEMING, TR ;
MACDONALD, JS ;
HALLER, DG ;
LAURIE, JA ;
TANGEN, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (08) :943-947
[9]   IMAGING OF COLORECTAL-CARCINOMA [J].
MOSS, AA .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (02) :308-310
[10]   Surgical management of locally recurrent rectal cancer [J].
Sagar, PM ;
Pemberton, JH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (03) :293-304