Comments on "can Post Keynesians make better use of behavioral economics?"

被引:2
作者
Fung, Matthew V. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Peters Coll, Jersey City, NJ USA
关键词
behavioral economics; heuristics; nonergodicity; Post Keynesian economics; psychology; uncertainty; PROSPECT-THEORY; UNCERTAINTY; INSTITUTIONS; PSYCHOLOGY; DECISION; REALITY; DEMAND;
D O I
10.2753/PKE0160-3477330202
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper "Can Post Keynesians Make Better Use of Behavioral Economics?" argues that "there is scope for a successful engagement between behavioral economics and Post Keynesian economics if it is based on explicitly stated common ground defined in terms of methodology." That argument limits the ways Post Keynesians can engage with behavioral economics. I suggest that Post Keynesians should also engage with behavioral economics on a theoretical level and discuss some ways Post Keynesians have already done so.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 249
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
[11]   Expectations and confidence under uncertainty [J].
DeQuech, D .
JOURNAL OF POST KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS, 1999, 21 (03) :415-430
[12]  
DOW SC, 2008, 22 SCEME STIRL UK
[13]   Post Keynesian pricing theory: Alternative foundations and prospects for future research [J].
Downward, P .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 25 (05) :661-670
[14]  
Drakopoulos S.A., 1994, Journal of Economic Surveys, V8, P133, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-6419.1994.TB00097.X
[15]   PSYCHOLOGICAL THRESHOLDS, DEMAND AND PRICE RIGIDITY [J].
DRAKOPOULOS, SA .
MANCHESTER SCHOOL OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL STUDIES, 1992, 60 (02) :152-168
[16]  
Duesenberry J.S., 1949, Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior
[17]   HOW ECONOMISTS CAN ACCEPT SHACKLE CRITIQUE OF ECONOMIC-DOCTRINES WITHOUT ARGUING THEMSELVES OUT OF THEIR JOBS [J].
EARL, PE ;
KAY, NM .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1985, 12 (1-2) :34-48
[18]   ECONOMICS AND PSYCHOLOGY - A SURVEY [J].
EARL, PE .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1990, 100 (402) :718-755
[19]  
Eichner AlfredS., 1987, MACRODYNAMICS ADV MA
[20]   WHY ECONOMICS IS NOT YET A SCIENCE [J].
EICHNER, AS .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES, 1983, 17 (02) :507-520