Identification of small for gestational age by population-based and customized growth charts in newborns of obese and normal-weight primiparous women

被引:7
|
作者
Lauring, Julianne R. [1 ]
Gupta, Megha [2 ]
Kunselman, Allen R. [3 ]
Repke, John T. [1 ]
Pauli, Jaimey M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Milton S Hershey Med Ctr, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hershey, PA USA
[2] Penn State Milton S Hershey Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 500 Univ Dr,H103, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[3] Penn State, Milton S Hershey Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Hershey, PA USA
关键词
Customized growth charts; estimated fetal weight; fetal growth restriction; obesity; small for gestational age; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH; CENTILES; INFANTS; RISK;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2016.1139568
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Our hypothesis was that newborns of obese mothers would be more likely to be classified as small for gestational age (SGA) by their customized growth curves than by the standard growth curves when compared to newborns of normal-weight mothers.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort of primiparous patients delivering between 1 July 2008 and 30 June 2012. Normal-weight was defined as BMI25kg/m(2) and obese as BMI30kg/m(2). Infant birth-weight was characterized as SGA or non-SGA from the Lubchenco curve, the Fenton Preterm Growth Chart, and the customized growth curve.Results: Infants were more likely to be classified as SGA on the customized curve compared with Lubchenco curve. Odds ratio was 2.8 (CI: 1.7-4.4; p=0.001) for obese women and was 2.9 (CI: 1.7-5.1; p<0.001) for normal-weight women. Infants were also more likely to be classified as SGA based on the customized curve compared with the Fenton Preterm Growth Curve. The odds ratio was 2.3 (CI: 1.4-3.8; p=0.001) for obese women and was 1.5 (CI: 1.01-2.33; p=0.04) for normal-weight women.Conclusions: Population-based curves may mask SGA in obese women. Our study demonstrates that customized growth curves identify more SGA than population-based growth curves in obese and normal-weight women.
引用
收藏
页码:3570 / 3574
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of customized growth charts on the identification of large for gestational age newborns
    Gonzalez Gonzalez, Nieves L.
    Plasencia, Walter
    Gonzalez Davila, Enrique
    Padron, Erika
    Garcia Hernandez, Jose A.
    Di Renzo, Gian C.
    Bartha, Jose L.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (01) : 62 - 65
  • [2] Abnormal Maternal Body Mass Index and Customized Fetal Weight Charts: Improving the Identification of Small for Gestational Age Fetuses and Newborns
    Gonzalez, Nieves Luisa Gonzalez
    Gonzalez Davila, Enrique
    Gonzalez Martin, Agustina
    Armas, Marina
    Tascon, Laura
    Farras, Alba
    Higueras, Teresa
    Mendoza, Manel
    Carreras, Elena
    Goya, Maria
    NUTRIENTS, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [3] International versus national growth charts for identifying small and large-for-gestational age newborns: A population-based study in 15 European countries
    Hocquette, Alice
    Durox, Melanie
    Wood, Rachael
    Klungsoyr, Kari
    Szamotulska, Katarzyna
    Berrut, Sylvan
    Rihs, Tonia
    Kyprianou, Theopisti
    Sakkeus, Luule
    Lecomte, Aline
    Zile, Irisa
    Alexander, Sophie
    Klimont, Jeannette
    Barros, Henrique
    Gatt, Miriam
    Isakova, Jelena
    Blondel, Beatrice
    Gissler, Mika
    Zeitlin, Jennifer
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-EUROPE, 2021, 8
  • [4] Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study
    Monier, I
    Ego, A.
    Benachi, A.
    Hocquette, A.
    Blondel, B.
    Goffinet, F.
    Zeitlin, J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, : 938 - 948
  • [5] Association between pregnancy complications and small-for-gestational-age birth weight defined by customized fetal growth standard versus a population-based standard
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Francis, Andre
    Cahill, Alison G.
    Macones, George A.
    Crane, James P.
    Gardosi, Jason
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2011, 24 (03) : 411 - 417
  • [6] Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles
    Gardosi, Jason
    Francis, Andre
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (01) : 28.e1 - 28.e8
  • [7] Assessing the Risk of Having Small for Gestational Age Newborns Among Lebanese Underweight and Normal Pre-pregnancy Weight Women
    El Rafei, Rym
    Abbas, Hussein A.
    Alameddine, Hind
    Al Bizri, Ayah
    Melki, Imad
    Yunis, Khalid A.
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2018, 22 (01) : 130 - 136
  • [8] Comparative Assessment of Ultrasound Placental Findings in Small for Gestational Age and Normal-Weight Fetuses
    Borna, Sedigheh
    Nasrolahi, Shahla
    Mohsenpour, Fatemeh
    Ghasemkani, Mehrana
    Mohsenpour, Ziba
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS-MASHHAD, 2020, 8 (01): : 10781 - +
  • [9] Rates of small for gestational age and low birth weight among underweight and normal weight women
    Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn
    Srikureja, Narisra
    MINERVA OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 75 (04) : 322 - 327
  • [10] Perinatal outcomes and placental histology in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies-A comparison of population-based and universal growth charts
    Ganer Herman, Hadas
    Keizman, Alina Rechulski
    Miremberg, Hadas
    Mizrachi, Yossi
    Dicker, Tomer
    Levy, Michal
    Schreiber, Letizia
    Kovo, Michal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 159 (03) : 825 - 832