Multi-environment Genomic Prediction of Plant Traits Using Deep Learners With Dense Architecture

被引:98
作者
Montesinos-Lopez, Abelardo [1 ]
Montesinos-Lopez, Osval A. [2 ]
Gianola, Daniel [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Crossa, Jose [7 ]
Hernandez-Suarez, Carlos M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guadalajara, Dept Matemat, CUCEI, Guadalajara 44430, Jalisco, Mexico
[2] Univ Colima, Fac Telemat, Colima 28040, Mexico
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Anim Sci, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Dairy Sci, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biostat, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[6] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med Informat, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[7] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr CIMMYT, Apdo Postal 6-641, Mexico City 06600, DF, Mexico
[8] Univ Colima, Fac Ciencias, Colima 28040, Mexico
关键词
GBLUP; deep learning; neural network; genomic prediction; prediction accuracy; GenPred; Shared Data Resources; SELECTION; ACCURACY; FUTURE; VALUES;
D O I
10.1534/g3.118.200740
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Genomic selection is revolutionizing plant breeding and therefore methods that improve prediction accuracy are useful. For this reason, active research is being conducted to build and test methods from other areas and adapt them to the context of genomic selection. In this paper we explore the novel deep learning (DL) methodology in the context of genomic selection. We compared DL methods with densely connected network architecture to one of the most often used genome-enabled prediction models: Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP). We used nine published real genomic data sets to compare a fraction of all possible deep learning models to obtain a meta picture of the performance of DL methods with densely connected network architecture. In general, the best predictions were obtained with the GBLUP model when genotypexenvironment interaction (GxE) was taken into account (8 out of 9 data sets); when the interactions were ignored, the DL method was better than the GBLUP in terms of prediction accuracy in 6 out of the 9 data sets. For this reason, we believe that DL should be added to the data science toolkit of scientists working on animal and plant breeding. This study corroborates the view that there are no universally best prediction machines.
引用
收藏
页码:3813 / 3828
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning [J].
Alipanahi, Babak ;
Delong, Andrew ;
Weirauch, Matthew T. ;
Frey, Brendan J. .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 33 (08) :831-+
[2]  
Angermueller C., 2017, GENOME BIOL, V18, P1, DOI DOI 10.1186/S13059-016-1139-1
[3]   Deep learning for computational biology [J].
Angermueller, Christof ;
Parnamaa, Tanel ;
Parts, Leopold ;
Stegle, Oliver .
MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2016, 12 (07)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, THESIS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, DEEPGS PREDICTING PH, DOI DOI 10.1101/241414
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, DEEP LEARNING KERAS
[7]  
[Anonymous], R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[8]   Genomic Selection in Commercial Perennial Crops: Applicability and Improvement in Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) [J].
Bin Kwong, Qi ;
Ong, Ai Ling ;
Teh, Chee Keng ;
Chew, Fook Tim ;
Tammi, Martti ;
Mayes, Sean ;
Kulaveerasingam, Harikrishna ;
Yeoh, Suat Hui ;
Harikrishna, Jennifer Ann ;
Appleton, David Ross .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
[9]   Invited review: Learning from the future-A vision for dairy farms and cows in 2067 [J].
Britt, J. H. ;
Cushman, R. A. ;
Dechow, C. D. ;
Dobson, H. ;
Humblot, P. ;
Hutjens, M. F. ;
Jones, G. A. ;
Ruegg, P. S. ;
Sheldon, I. M. ;
Stevenson, J. S. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2018, 101 (05) :3722-3741
[10]  
Chollet F., 2017, Deep Learning with R: Manning