An EU Recycling Target: What Does the Dutch Evidence Tell Us?

被引:32
作者
Dijkgraaf, Elbert [1 ,2 ]
Gradus, Raymond [3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Econ, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Tinbergen Inst, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Econ & Business Adm, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Recycling; Waste policy; EU-target; Local government; Netherlands; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; HOUSEHOLD WASTE; GARBAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-016-0027-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The European Union (EU) advocates a household waste recycling rate of more than 65 %. Although the Netherlands has already invested heavily in recycling policies, this is still a big challenge as nowadays this rate is approximately 50 % on average and very few no municipalities have a rate above 65 %. Given this practice, it is possible to learn from the Dutch experience which policies are effective in increasing recycling rates. Based on a large panel data set for the Netherlands, we show that unit-based pricing, avoiding a duo-bin for unsorted and compostable waste, and reducing the frequency of collecting unsorted and compostable waste at the curbside are effective in raising the recycling rate. However, only a bag-based pricing system has a substantial effect, but this policy can have some adverse effects. Other unit-based pricing systems have effects of less than 10 % points. In nearly all cases, changing the frequency of collection of recyclables has no or very small effects. Moreover, the complementarity between unit-based pricing and curbside service is low. Overall, it seems very difficult to reach the EU goal of 65 % with the policies applied.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 526
页数:26
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Abbott A., 2014, HDB WASTE MANAGEMENT, P53
[2]   Recycling: Social norms and warm-glow revisited [J].
Abbott, Andrew ;
Nandeibam, Shasikanta ;
O'Shea, Lucy .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 90 :10-18
[3]   Explaining the variation in household recycling rates across the UK [J].
Abbott, Andrew ;
Nandeibam, Shasikanta ;
O'Shea, Lucy .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 70 (11) :2214-2223
[4]   Effects of Unit-Based Garbage Pricing: A Differences-in-Differences Approach [J].
Allers, Maarten A. ;
Hoeben, Corine .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2010, 45 (03) :405-428
[5]   Curbside recycling in the presence of alternatives [J].
Beatty, Timothy K. M. ;
Berck, Peter ;
Shimshack, Jay P. .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2007, 45 (04) :739-755
[6]   Effects of unit-based pricing on household waste collection demand: A meta-regression analysis [J].
Bel, Derma ;
Gradus, Raymond .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 44 :169-182
[7]   Strategic interaction among governments: An overview of empirical studies [J].
Brueckner, JK .
INTERNATIONAL REGIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2003, 26 (02) :175-188
[8]  
Callan S., 1997, E ECON J, V23, P411
[9]   Economies of scale and scope: A cost analysis of municipal solid waste services [J].
Callan, SJ ;
Thomas, JM .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2001, 77 (04) :548-560
[10]   Cost savings in unit-based pricing of household waste - The case of The Netherlands [J].
Dijkgraaf, E ;
Gradus, RHJM .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (04) :353-371