Did you say reference conditions? Ecological and socio-economic perspectives on the European Water Framework Directive

被引:92
作者
Bouleau, Gabrielle [1 ]
Pont, Didier [2 ]
机构
[1] Irstea, UR ETBX Environm Territoires & Infrastruct, F-33612 Cestas, France
[2] Irstea, UR HBAN Hydrosyst & Bioproc, F-10030 Antony CS, France
关键词
Water Framework Directive; Climate change; Reference conditions; Bio-indicators; River restoration; Legally binding standards; Open method of coordination; Ecological modernization; FISH-BASED INDEX; RIVER HEALTH; RESTORATION; MANAGEMENT; UNCERTAINTY; ENVIRONMENT; LANDSCAPE; IMPACTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Reference conditions are a key concept in the European Water Framework Directive (WFD). The WFD stipulates that the ecological status of a given water body shall be assessed by quantifying the deviation from a set of reference conditions that represent the stable state of an ecosystem in the absence of significant human disturbance. This concept is subject to criticism from several authors, particularly because underlying ecological concepts are weak and the distinction between natural variability and the effects of anthropogenic activities on ecosystem function will become increasingly artificial. In this paper, a sociologist and an aquatic ecologist examine the origin, successes and limits of the reference conditions concept and raise important questions about applying this concept in practice. We argue that this concept fitted specific needs from different institutions and stakeholders which promoted the WFD. Monitoring practices using this concept require some adaptations. Setting goals for restoration based on reference conditions is more problematic. A more adaptive management approach would be wiser. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 41
页数:10
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Anderson T., 1991, Free Market Environmentalism
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, ADV HIST ECOLOGY, DOI DOI 10.1073/pnas.0801918105
[3]  
[Anonymous], WATER FRAMEWORK DIRE
[4]  
Aronson James, 2006, Journal for Nature Conservation (Jena), V14, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.jnc.2006.05.005
[5]  
Aubin D, 2004, ENVIRON POLICY, V40, P49
[6]  
Barone S., 2011, POLE SUD, V35, P43
[7]   Intercalibrating classifications of ecological status: Europe's quest for common management objectives for aquatic ecosystems [J].
Birk, S. ;
Willby, N. J. ;
Kelly, M. G. ;
Bonne, W. ;
Borja, A. ;
Poikane, S. ;
van de Bund, W. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 454 :490-499
[8]  
Bouleau G., 2014, Natures Sciences Societes, V22, P3, DOI 10.1051/nss/2014016
[9]   The WFD dreams: between ecology and economics [J].
Bouleau, Gabrielle .
WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 22 (04) :235-240
[10]   How ecological indicators construction reveals social changes-The case of lakes and rivers in France [J].
Bouleau, Gabrielle ;
Argillier, Christine ;
Souchon, Yves ;
Barthelemy, Carole ;
Babut, Marc .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2009, 9 (06) :1198-1205