Explicit optimization of plan quality measures in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning

被引:16
作者
Engberg, Lovisa [1 ]
Forsgren, Anders [1 ]
Eriksson, Kjell [2 ]
Hardemark, Bjorn [2 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Math, Optimizat & Syst Theory, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] RaySearch Labs, Sveavagen 44, SE-10365 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
convex optimization; mean-tail-dose; planning objectives; DELIVERABLE NAVIGATION;
D O I
10.1002/mp.12146
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To formulate convex planning objectives of treatment plan multicriteria optimization with explicit relationships to the dose-volume histogram (DVH) statistics used in plan quality evaluation. Methods: Conventional planning objectives are designed to minimize the violation of DVH statistics thresholds using penalty functions. Although successful in guiding the DVH curve towards these thresholds, conventional planning objectives offer limited control of the individual points on the DVH curve (doses-at-volume) used to evaluate plan quality. In this study, we abandon the usual penalty-function framework and propose planning objectives that more closely relate to DVH statistics. The proposed planning objectives are based on mean-tail-dose, resulting in convex optimization. We also demonstrate how to adapt a standard optimization method to the proposed formulation in order to obtain a substantial reduction in computational cost. Results: We investigated the potential of the proposed planning objectives as tools for optimizing DVH statistics through juxtaposition with the conventional planning objectives on two patient cases. Sets of treatment plans with differently balanced planning objectives were generated using either the proposed or the conventional approach. Dominance in the sense of better distributed doses-at-volume was observed in plans optimized within the proposed framework. Conclusion: The initial computational study indicates that the DVH statistics are better optimized and more efficiently balanced using the proposed planning objectives than using the conventional approach. (C) 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:2045 / 2053
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]   Deliverable navigation for multicriteria IMRT treatment planning by combining shared and individual apertures [J].
Fredriksson, Albin ;
Bokrantz, Rasmus .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (21) :7683-7697
[12]   Automated improvement of radiation therapy treatment plans by optimization under reference dose constraints [J].
Fredriksson, Albin .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (23) :7799-7811
[13]   SNOPT: An SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization (Reprinted from SIAM Journal Optimization, vol 12, pg 979-1006, 2002) [J].
Gill, PE ;
Murray, W ;
Saunders, MA .
SIAM REVIEW, 2005, 47 (01) :99-131
[14]   Initial evaluation of automated treatment planning software [J].
Gintz, Dawn ;
Latifi, Kujtim ;
Caudell, Jimmy ;
Nelms, Benjamin ;
Zhang, Geoffrey ;
Moros, Eduardo ;
Feygelman, Vladimir .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (03) :331-346
[15]  
Gondzio J., 1996, Computational Optimization and Applications, V6, P137, DOI 10.1007/BF00249643
[16]   Automatic planning of head and neck treatment plans [J].
Hazell, Irene ;
Bzdusek, Karl ;
Kumar, Prashant ;
Hansen, Christian R. ;
Bertelsen, Anders ;
Eriksen, Jesper G. ;
Johansen, Jorgen ;
Brink, Carsten .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (01) :272-282
[17]   Costlets: A generalized approach to cost functions for automated optimization of IMRT treatment plans [J].
Kessler, ML ;
McShan, DL ;
Epelman, MA ;
Vineberg, KA ;
Eisbruch, A ;
Lawrence, TS ;
Fraass, BA .
OPTIMIZATION AND ENGINEERING, 2005, 6 (04) :421-448
[18]   Dose-volume histogram prediction using density estimation [J].
Munter, Johanna Skarpman ;
Sjolund, Jens .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (17) :6923-6936
[19]  
Rasmus B., 2013, THESIS
[20]   A new linear programming approach to radiation therapy treatment planning problems [J].
Romeijn, HE ;
Ahuja, RK ;
Dempsey, JF ;
Kumar, A .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2006, 54 (02) :201-216