Short communication: Analytical models for 2D landscape evolution

被引:9
作者
Steer, Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rennes, Geosci Rennes, CNRS, UMR 6118, F-35000 Rennes, France
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
STREAM POWER EQUATION; RIVER INCISION MODEL; MOUNTAIN-RANGES; HILLSLOPE; EROSION; UPLIFT; PREDICTION; INVERSION; TRANSPORT; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.5194/esurf-9-1239-2021
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Numerical modelling offers a unique approach to understand how tectonics, climate and surface processes govern landscape dynamics. However, the efficiency and accuracy of current landscape evolution models remain a certain limitation. Here, I develop a new modelling strategy that relies on the use of 1D analytical solutions to the linear stream power equation to compute the dynamics of landscapes in 2D. This strategy uses the 1D ordering, by a directed acyclic graph, of model nodes based on their location along the water flow path to propagate topographic changes in 2D. This analytical model can be used to compute in a single time step, with an iterative procedure, the steady-state topography of landscapes subjected to river, colluvial and hillslope erosion. This model can also be adapted to compute the dynamic evolution of landscapes under either heterogeneous or time-variable uplift rate. This new model leads to slope-area relationships exactly consistent with predictions and to the exact preservation of knickpoint shape throughout their migration. Moreover, the absence of numerical diffusion or of an upper bound for the time step offers significant advantages compared to numerical models. The main drawback of this novel approach is that it does not guarantee the time continuity of the topography through successive time steps, despite practically having little impact on model behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:1239 / 1250
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   The Effect of Inhomogeneous Magnetic Permeability on Magnetotelluric Responses: 1D and 2D Models [J].
Lozovsky, I. N. ;
Varentsov, Iv M. .
IZVESTIYA-PHYSICS OF THE SOLID EARTH, 2022, 58 (05) :615-625
[32]   Criteria for the use of 1D and 2D models in catalytic membrane reactor modeling [J].
Lundin, Sean-Thomas B. ;
Miklautz, Marina ;
Ikeda, Ayumi ;
Hasegawa, Yasuhisa ;
Oyama, S. Ted .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2023, 477
[33]   2D and 3D-QSPR Models for the Fluorophilicity of Organic Compounds in Consideration of Chirality [J].
Hu, Gui-Xiang ;
Zou, Jian-Wei ;
Zeng, Min ;
Pan, Shan-Fei ;
Yu, Qing-Sen .
QSAR & COMBINATORIAL SCIENCE, 2009, 28 (10) :1112-1122
[34]   Introducing CUDISC: a 2D code for protoplanetary disc structure and evolution calculations [J].
Robinson, Alfie ;
Booth, Richard A. ;
Owen, James E. .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 529 (02) :1524-1541
[35]   The probabilistic nature of dune collisions in 2D [J].
Jarvis, Paul A. ;
Narteau, Clement ;
Rozier, Olivier ;
Vriend, Nathalie M. .
EARTH SURFACE DYNAMICS, 2023, 11 (04) :803-815
[36]   Machine-Learning Analysis to Predict the Exciton Valley Polarization Landscape of 2D Semiconductors [J].
Tanaka, Kenya ;
Hachiya, Kengo ;
Zhang, Wenjin ;
Matsuda, Kazunari ;
Miyauchi, Yuhei .
ACS NANO, 2019, 13 (11) :12687-12693
[37]   DOMAIN GROWTH IN COMPRESSIBLE 2D ISING MODELS UNDERGOING PHASE SEPARATION [J].
Mitchell, S. J. ;
Landau, D. P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS C, 2009, 20 (09) :1325-1333
[38]   Comparative Study of 2D Lattice Boltzmann Models for Simulating Seismic Waves [J].
Xia, Muming ;
Zhou, Hui ;
Jiang, Chuntao ;
Cui, Jinming ;
Zeng, Yong ;
Chen, Hanming ;
De Santis, Angelo .
REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (02)
[39]   Splitting of the superconducting transition in the two weakly coupled 2D XY models [J].
Medvedyeva, K ;
Kim, BJ ;
Minnhagen, P .
PHYSICA C-SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2002, 369 (1-4) :282-285
[40]   Conformity of Monte Carlo and analytical solutions for one 2D scattering problem in biomedical optics [J].
Tarasov, A. P. ;
Raznitsyna, I. A. ;
Rogatkin, D. A. .
2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE LASER OPTICS (ICLO 2018), 2018, :515-515