Short communication: Analytical models for 2D landscape evolution

被引:8
作者
Steer, Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rennes, Geosci Rennes, CNRS, UMR 6118, F-35000 Rennes, France
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
STREAM POWER EQUATION; RIVER INCISION MODEL; MOUNTAIN-RANGES; HILLSLOPE; EROSION; UPLIFT; PREDICTION; INVERSION; TRANSPORT; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.5194/esurf-9-1239-2021
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Numerical modelling offers a unique approach to understand how tectonics, climate and surface processes govern landscape dynamics. However, the efficiency and accuracy of current landscape evolution models remain a certain limitation. Here, I develop a new modelling strategy that relies on the use of 1D analytical solutions to the linear stream power equation to compute the dynamics of landscapes in 2D. This strategy uses the 1D ordering, by a directed acyclic graph, of model nodes based on their location along the water flow path to propagate topographic changes in 2D. This analytical model can be used to compute in a single time step, with an iterative procedure, the steady-state topography of landscapes subjected to river, colluvial and hillslope erosion. This model can also be adapted to compute the dynamic evolution of landscapes under either heterogeneous or time-variable uplift rate. This new model leads to slope-area relationships exactly consistent with predictions and to the exact preservation of knickpoint shape throughout their migration. Moreover, the absence of numerical diffusion or of an upper bound for the time step offers significant advantages compared to numerical models. The main drawback of this novel approach is that it does not guarantee the time continuity of the topography through successive time steps, despite practically having little impact on model behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:1239 / 1250
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Manufacturing an Exact Solution for 2D Thermochemical Mantle Convection Models
    Trim, S. J.
    Butler, S. L.
    McAdam, S. S. C.
    Spiteri, R. J.
    GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS, 2023, 24 (04)
  • [22] Comparison of the Performance of the Memristor Models in 2D Cellular Nonlinear Network
    Isah, Aliyu
    Nguetcho, Aurelien Serge Tchakoutio
    Binczak, Stephane
    Bilbault, Jean-Marie
    ELECTRONICS, 2021, 10 (13)
  • [23] Self-consistent 2D models of fast-rotating early-type stars
    Lara, F. Espinosa
    Rieutord, M.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2013, 552
  • [24] Temperature-dependent criticality in random 2D Ising models
    Metra, Matteo
    Zorrilla, Luc
    Zani, Maurizio
    Puppin, Ezio
    Biscari, Paolo
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2021, 136 (09)
  • [25] Autonomous generation of alluvial fans in landscape evolution models
    Han, Kyungdoe
    Wilson, John L.
    Emry, Erica
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2023, 48 (14) : 2842 - 2863
  • [26] Evolutionary pathways in soil-landscape evolution models
    van der Meij, W. Marijn
    SOIL, 2022, 8 (01) : 381 - 389
  • [27] Landscape evolution models using the stream power incision model show unrealistic behavior when m/n equals 0.5
    Kwang, Jeffrey S.
    Parker, Gary
    EARTH SURFACE DYNAMICS, 2017, 5 (04) : 807 - 820
  • [28] 2D and 3D numerical models on compositionally buoyant diapirs in the mantle wedge
    Hasenclever, Joerg
    Morgan, Jason Phipps
    Hort, Matthias
    Ruepke, Lars H.
    EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2011, 311 (1-2) : 53 - 68
  • [29] Strongly Coupled 2D and 3D Shallow Water Models: Theory and Verification
    Choudhary, Gajanan K.
    Trahan, Corey J.
    Pettey, Lucas
    Farthing, Matthew
    Berger, Charlie
    Savant, Gaurav
    Inanc, Ece
    Dawson, Clint
    Loveland, Mark
    JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, 2025, 151 (01)
  • [30] The Effect of Inhomogeneous Magnetic Permeability on Magnetotelluric Responses: 1D and 2D Models
    Lozovsky, I. N.
    Varentsov, Iv M.
    IZVESTIYA-PHYSICS OF THE SOLID EARTH, 2022, 58 (05) : 615 - 625