Emollient prescribing formularies in England and Wales: a cross-sectional study

被引:10
作者
Chan, Jonathan P. [1 ]
Boyd, Grace [1 ]
Quinn, Patrick A. [1 ]
Ridd, Matthew J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2018年 / 8卷 / 06期
关键词
ECZEMA;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To identify and compare emollient formularies across all clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) and local health boards (LHBs) in England and Wales. Design Formularies were retrieved via CCG/LHB websites or Google search (October 2016-February 2017). Data on structure and content were extracted, and descriptive analyses were undertaken. Setting 209 English CCGs and 7 Welsh LHBs. Main outcome measures Number and structure of formularies; number, type and name of emollients and bath additive recommendedandnot recommended; and any rationale given. Results 102formularies were identified, which named 109 emollients and 24 bath additives. Most were structured in an 'order of preference' (63%) and/or formulation (51%) format. Creams and ointments were the most commonly recommended types of emollients, and three ointments were the most commonly recommended specific emollients (71%-79% of formularies). However, there was poor consensus over which emollient should be used first line and 4 out of 10 of the most recommended lotions and creams contained antimicrobials or urea. Patient preference (60%) and/or cost (58%) were the most common reasons given for the recommendations. Of the 82% of formularies that recommend the use of bath additives, 75% did not give any reasons for their recommendation. Conclusions Emollient formularies in England and Wales vary widely in their structure, recommendations and rationale. The reasons for such inconsistencies are undear, risk confusion and make for inequitable regional variation. There is poor justification for multiple different, conflicting formularies.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] The Eczema Priority Setting Partnership: a collaboration between patients, carers, clinicians and researchers to identify and prioritize important research questions for the treatment of eczema
    Batchelor, J. M.
    Ridd, M. J.
    Clarke, T.
    Ahmed, A.
    Cox, M.
    Crowe, S.
    Howard, M.
    Lawton, S.
    McPhee, M.
    Rani, A.
    Ravenscroft, J. C.
    Roberts, A.
    Thomas, K. S.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2013, 168 (03) : 577 - 582
  • [2] Fedorowicz Z, 2017, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V2
  • [3] Keratolytics and Emollients and Their Role in the Therapy of Psoriasis: a Systematic Review
    Jacobi A.
    Mayer A.
    Augustin M.
    [J]. Dermatology and Therapy, 2015, 5 (1) : 1 - 18
  • [4] GPs' experiences of diagnosing and managing childhood eczema: a qualitative study in primary care
    Le Roux, Emma
    Powell, Kingsley
    Banks, Jonathan P.
    Ridd, Matthew J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2018, 68 (667) : E73 - E80
  • [5] Irritant reactions to an antiseptic bath emollient
    Ling, TC
    Highet, AS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2000, 11 (04) : 263 - 267
  • [6] Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, 2013, MHRA UK PUBL ASS REP
  • [7] What is the evidence base for atopic eczema treatments? A summary of published randomized controlled trials
    Nankervis, H.
    Thomas, K. S.
    Delamere, F. M.
    Barbarot, S.
    Smith, S.
    Rogers, N. K.
    Williams, H. C.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2017, 176 (04) : 910 - 927
  • [8] NHS-Wales, 2017, PRIM CAR SERV PRESCR
  • [9] NHSBSA, 2017, PRESCR COST AN PCA D
  • [10] NICE, 2007, NICE CLIN GUID CG057