Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates

被引:207
作者
McCabe, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Goucher Coll, Dept Psychol, Baltimore, MD 21204 USA
关键词
Metacognition; Metamemory; Learning strategies; Undergraduate education; PRACTICE RETRIEVAL; SPLIT-ATTENTION; MEMORY; JUDGMENTS; PERFORMANCE; CALIBRATION; ALLOCATION; RETENTION; TIME;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-010-0035-2
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Two studies examined undergraduates' metacognitive awareness of six empirically-supported learning strategies. Study 1 results overall suggested an inability to predict the learning outcomes of educational scenarios describing the strategies of dual-coding, static-media presentations, low-interest extraneous details, testing, and spacing; there was, however, weak endorsement of the strategy of generating one's own study materials. In addition, an independent measure of metacognitive self-regulation was correlated with scenario performance. Study 2 demonstrated higher prediction accuracy for students who had received targeted instruction on applied memory topics in their psychology courses, and the best performance for those students directly exposed to the original empirical studies from which the scenarios were derived. In sum, this research suggests that undergraduates are largely unaware of several specific strategies that could benefit memory for course information; further, training in applied learning and memory topics has the potential to improve metacognitive judgments in these domains.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 476
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Examining the Testing Effect with Open- and Closed-Book Tests [J].
Agarwal, Pooja K. ;
Karpicke, Jeffrey D. ;
Kang, Sean H. K. ;
Roediger, Henry L., III ;
McDermott, Kathleen B. .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 22 (07) :861-876
[2]   Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia? [J].
Azevedo, R ;
Cromley, JG .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 96 (03) :523-535
[3]   GENERATING MAKES WORDS MEMORABLE, BUT SO DOES EFFECTIVE READING [J].
BEGG, I ;
VINSKI, E ;
FRANKOVICH, L ;
HOLGATE, B .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1991, 19 (05) :487-497
[4]   Metacognitive control of the spacing of study repetitions [J].
Benjamin, Aaron S. ;
Bird, Randy D. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2006, 55 (01) :126-137
[5]   The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index [J].
Benjamin, AS ;
Bjork, RA ;
Schwartz, BL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1998, 127 (01) :55-68
[6]  
Bjork RA., 1994, Metacognition: Knowing about knowing, P185, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/4561.003.0011
[7]  
Bloom CM, 2006, TEACH PSYCHOL, V33, P128
[8]   Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting [J].
Butler, Andrew C. ;
Roediger, Henry L., III .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 19 (4-5) :514-527
[9]   Processing strategies and the generation effect: Implications for making a better reader [J].
DeWinstanley, PA ;
Bjork, EL .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2004, 32 (06) :945-955
[10]   The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire [J].
Duncan, TG ;
McKeachie, WJ .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2005, 40 (02) :117-128