The Social Interaction Phobia Scale: Continued support for the psychometric validity of the SIPS using clinical and non-clinical samples

被引:29
作者
Menatti, Alison R. [1 ]
Weeks, Justin W. [2 ]
Carleton, R. Nicholas [3 ]
Morrison, Amanda S. [4 ]
Heimberg, Richard G. [4 ]
Hope, Debra A. [5 ]
Blanco, Carlos [6 ]
Schneier, Franklin R. [6 ]
Liebowitz, Michael R. [7 ]
机构
[1] Ohio Univ, Lab Study & Prevent Sexual Assault, Dept Psychol, Athens, OH 45701 USA
[2] Ohio Univ, Ctr Evaluat & Treatment Anxiety, Dept Psychol, Athens, OH 45701 USA
[3] Univ Regina, Dept Psychol, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
[4] Temple Univ, Adult Anxiety Clin Temple, Dept Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[5] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Dept Psychol, Lincoln, NE USA
[6] Columbia Univ, New York State Psychiat Inst, Dept Psychiat, Coll Physicians & Surg, New York, NY 10027 USA
[7] Columbia Univ, Dept Psychiat, Coll Physicians & Surg, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
Anxiety; Social anxiety disorder; Social phobia; Psychometric characteristics; Social interaction anxiety; Fear of public scrutiny; INTERACTION ANXIETY SCALE; NEGATIVE-EVALUATION-SCALE; POSITIVE EVALUATION SCALE; BRIEF-FEAR; SHORT FORMS; DSM-IV; FUNDAMENTAL FEARS; MOOD DISORDERS; FIT INDEXES; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.03.003
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The present study sought to extend findings supporting the psychometric validity of a promising measure of social anxiety (SA) symptoms, the Social Interaction Phobia Scale (SIPS; Carleton et al., 2009). Analyses were conducted using three samples: social anxiety disorder (SAD) patients, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) patients, and healthy controls. SIPS scores of SAD patients demonstrated internal consistency and construct validity, and the previously demonstrated three-factor structure of the SIPS was replicated. Further, the SIPS total score uniquely predicted SA symptoms, and SIPS scores were significantly higher for SAD patients than GAD patients or controls. Two cut-off scores that discriminated SAD patients from GAD patients and from healthy controls were identified. The current study is the first to replicate the SIPS three-factor model in a large, treatment-seeking sample of SAD patients and establish a cut-off score discriminating SAD from GAD patients. Findings support the SIPS as a valid, SAD-specific assessment instrument. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 55
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
[41]   COMPARING CORRELATED CORRELATION-COEFFICIENTS [J].
MENG, XL ;
ROSENTHAL, R ;
RUBIN, DB .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 111 (01) :172-175
[42]  
Mennin D. S., 2010, PAPER PRESENTED AT T
[43]  
Mennin D. S., 2012, PAPER PRESENTED AT T
[44]   Coefficient Alpha: A Basic Introduction From the Perspectives of Classical Test Theory and Structural Equation Modeling [J].
Miller, Michael B. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1995, 2 (03) :255-273
[45]   The social phobia and social interaction anxiety scales: Evaluation of psychometric properties [J].
Osman, A ;
Gutierrez, PM ;
Barrios, FX ;
Kopper, BA ;
Chiros, CE .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 1998, 20 (03) :249-264
[46]   Development of a Short Form Social Interaction Anxiety (SIAS) and Social Phobia Scale (SPS) Using Nonparametric Item Response Theory: The SIAS-6 and the SPS-6 [J].
Peters, Lorna ;
Sunderland, Matthew ;
Andrews, Gavin ;
Rapee, Ronald M. ;
Mattick, Richard P. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2012, 24 (01) :66-76
[47]  
Peterson RA, 1999, LEA SER PER CLIN PSY, P61
[48]   Psychometric evaluation of the Social Interaction Phobia Scale [J].
Reilly, Alison R. ;
Carleton, R. Nicholas ;
Weeks, Justin W. .
ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING, 2012, 25 (05) :529-542
[49]   ANXIETY SENSITIVITY, ANXIETY FREQUENCY AND THE PREDICTION OF FEARFULNESS [J].
REISS, S ;
PETERSON, RA ;
GURSKY, DM ;
MCNALLY, RJ .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1986, 24 (01) :1-8
[50]   More information from fewer questions: The factor structure and item properties of the original and brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale [J].
Rodebaugh, TL ;
Woods, CM ;
Thissen, DM ;
Heimberg, RG ;
Chambless, DL ;
Rapee, RM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2004, 16 (02) :169-181