Modeling water regulation ecosystem services: A review in the context of ecosystem accounting

被引:28
|
作者
Nedkov, Stoyan [10 ]
Campagne, Sylvie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Borisova, Bilyana [4 ]
Krpec, Petr [5 ]
Prodanova, Hristina [1 ]
Kokkoris, Ioannis P. [6 ]
Hristova, Desislava [1 ]
Le Clec'h, Solen [7 ]
Santos-Martin, Fernando [8 ]
Burkhard, Benjamin
Bekri, Eleni S. [9 ]
Stoycheva, Vanya [1 ]
Bruzon, Adrian G. [8 ]
Dimopoulos, Panayotis [6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Geophys, Geodesy & Geog Bulgarian Acad Sci, Sofia 1113, Bulgaria
[2] Landscape Ecol Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Phys Geog, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
[3] Sorbonne Univ, Stn Biol Roscoff, CNRS, UMR7144, Pl Georges Teissier, F-29680 Roscoff, France
[4] Sofia Univ St Kliment Ohridski, Fac Geol & Geog, Landscape Ecol Dept, Sofia, Bulgaria
[5] Czech Acad Sci, Global Change Res Inst, Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
[6] Univ Patras, Patras 26504, Greece
[7] Wageningen Univ & Res, Environm Syst Anal Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[8] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Dept Chem & Environm Technol, ESCET, C-Tulip S-N,Mostoles, Madrid 28933, Spain
[9] Univ Patras, Dept Civil Engn Environm Engn Lab, Univ Campus, Patras 26504, Greece
[10] Akad G Bonchev str Bl3, Sofia 1113, Bulgaria
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Literature review; Ecosystem functions; Hydrologic models; Model classification; SWAT; InVEST; SUPPLY-AND-DEMAND; LAND-USE CHANGE; RIVER-BASIN; RETENTION FUNCTION; MANAGEMENT; CLIMATE; IMPACT; REFLECTIONS; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101458
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Natural Capital Accounting (NCA) has evolved rapidly in recent years through substantial efforts of both international organizations and the scientific community. Water regulation ecosystem services (ES) are key elements of regulating services in ecosystem accounting, with most relevant studies strongly relying on models for ES quantification up to now. In this paper, we provide a review of modeling efforts for water regulation ES based on 148 scientific papers, properly systematized, analyzed and interpreted by using a detailed and structured original template. We examined emerging trends and gaps in model applications and the readiness to integrate them into the NCA and SEEA-EA frameworks. We propose a classification scheme which organizes the 92 different models and modeling approaches identified in the review process into eight model categories so that this scheme can be efficiently used in the water ES assessment of and for further integration into the accounting framework. Among the models, the hydrologic model SWAT and the modeling tool InVEST are by far the most popular. The results of the review revealed differences between the general ES literature and the accounting related papers. Moreover, our analysis sets the basis for useful recommendations of which model categories are the most appropriate for the water regulation ES, included in the SEEA-EA reference list. Based on the number of relevant papers, the reliability and the confidence level of the recommendations for the use of models have been incorporated in our analysis. We highlight as model category with the highest confidence the ones relative to quantification water flow and flood control service aiming at ES accounting. Models for erosion control ES can only be recommended with a lower confidence, while for water purification the results lack clear evidence for using a particular group of models. Based on the research findings we identified the main research priorities on model integration in the accounting of water regulation ES: 1) further development of guidelines for the use of models in ecosystem accounting; 2) analyses of the spatial aspects of the model towards a clear distinction between ecosystem service supply and use; and 3) development of integrated modeling approaches for water regulation ES accounting.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Identification and Assessment of Ecosystem Services: the International Context
    Bobylev, S.
    Goryacheva, A.
    VESTNIK MEZHDUNARODNYKH ORGANIZATSII-INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2019, 14 (01): : 225 - 236
  • [42] Contextualizing context in the analysis of payment for ecosystem services
    Juliana Rodriguez-Robayo, Karla
    Merino-Perez, Leticia
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 23 : 259 - 267
  • [43] An overview of a land evaluation in the context of ecosystem services
    Janku, Jaroslava
    Jehlicka, Jan
    Hermanova, Kristina
    Toth, Daniel
    Maitah, Mansoor
    Kozak, Josef
    Vopravil, Jan
    Vacha, Radim
    Jacko, Karel
    Herza, Tomas
    SOIL AND WATER RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [44] Emerging markets for ecosystem services: Setting the context
    Anisfeld, Shimon
    Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 2007, 25 (1-2) : 1 - 14
  • [45] Accounting and valuing the ecosystem services related to water supply in the Central Highlands of Victoria, Australia
    Vardon, Michael
    Keith, Heather
    Lindenmayer, David
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 39
  • [46] Nature for water: Ecosystem services and water management
    Enderlein, R
    Bernardini, F
    NATURAL RESOURCES FORUM, 2005, 29 (03) : 253 - 255
  • [47] Modeling interactions among multiple ecosystem services. A critical review
    Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar Augusto
    Hurtado Bustos, Sandra Liliana
    Parrado Moreno, Carmen Alicia
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2020, 429
  • [48] Ecosystem governance of rural water ecosystem services under sustainable utilization
    Yang, Shujie
    WATER SUPPLY, 2023, 23 (09) : 3899 - 3911
  • [49] Soil and water ecosystem services of agroforestry
    Udawatta, Ranjith R.
    Gantzer, Clark J.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2022, 77 (01) : 5A - 11A
  • [50] Assessing the Capacity of Ecosystems to Supply Ecosystem Services Using Remote Sensing and An Ecosystem Accounting Approach
    Vargas, Leonardo
    Willemen, Louise
    Hein, Lars
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 63 (01) : 1 - 15