Modeling water regulation ecosystem services: A review in the context of ecosystem accounting

被引:28
|
作者
Nedkov, Stoyan [10 ]
Campagne, Sylvie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Borisova, Bilyana [4 ]
Krpec, Petr [5 ]
Prodanova, Hristina [1 ]
Kokkoris, Ioannis P. [6 ]
Hristova, Desislava [1 ]
Le Clec'h, Solen [7 ]
Santos-Martin, Fernando [8 ]
Burkhard, Benjamin
Bekri, Eleni S. [9 ]
Stoycheva, Vanya [1 ]
Bruzon, Adrian G. [8 ]
Dimopoulos, Panayotis [6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Geophys, Geodesy & Geog Bulgarian Acad Sci, Sofia 1113, Bulgaria
[2] Landscape Ecol Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Phys Geog, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
[3] Sorbonne Univ, Stn Biol Roscoff, CNRS, UMR7144, Pl Georges Teissier, F-29680 Roscoff, France
[4] Sofia Univ St Kliment Ohridski, Fac Geol & Geog, Landscape Ecol Dept, Sofia, Bulgaria
[5] Czech Acad Sci, Global Change Res Inst, Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
[6] Univ Patras, Patras 26504, Greece
[7] Wageningen Univ & Res, Environm Syst Anal Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[8] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Dept Chem & Environm Technol, ESCET, C-Tulip S-N,Mostoles, Madrid 28933, Spain
[9] Univ Patras, Dept Civil Engn Environm Engn Lab, Univ Campus, Patras 26504, Greece
[10] Akad G Bonchev str Bl3, Sofia 1113, Bulgaria
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Literature review; Ecosystem functions; Hydrologic models; Model classification; SWAT; InVEST; SUPPLY-AND-DEMAND; LAND-USE CHANGE; RIVER-BASIN; RETENTION FUNCTION; MANAGEMENT; CLIMATE; IMPACT; REFLECTIONS; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101458
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Natural Capital Accounting (NCA) has evolved rapidly in recent years through substantial efforts of both international organizations and the scientific community. Water regulation ecosystem services (ES) are key elements of regulating services in ecosystem accounting, with most relevant studies strongly relying on models for ES quantification up to now. In this paper, we provide a review of modeling efforts for water regulation ES based on 148 scientific papers, properly systematized, analyzed and interpreted by using a detailed and structured original template. We examined emerging trends and gaps in model applications and the readiness to integrate them into the NCA and SEEA-EA frameworks. We propose a classification scheme which organizes the 92 different models and modeling approaches identified in the review process into eight model categories so that this scheme can be efficiently used in the water ES assessment of and for further integration into the accounting framework. Among the models, the hydrologic model SWAT and the modeling tool InVEST are by far the most popular. The results of the review revealed differences between the general ES literature and the accounting related papers. Moreover, our analysis sets the basis for useful recommendations of which model categories are the most appropriate for the water regulation ES, included in the SEEA-EA reference list. Based on the number of relevant papers, the reliability and the confidence level of the recommendations for the use of models have been incorporated in our analysis. We highlight as model category with the highest confidence the ones relative to quantification water flow and flood control service aiming at ES accounting. Models for erosion control ES can only be recommended with a lower confidence, while for water purification the results lack clear evidence for using a particular group of models. Based on the research findings we identified the main research priorities on model integration in the accounting of water regulation ES: 1) further development of guidelines for the use of models in ecosystem accounting; 2) analyses of the spatial aspects of the model towards a clear distinction between ecosystem service supply and use; and 3) development of integrated modeling approaches for water regulation ES accounting.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An assessment of ecosystem services: Water flow regulation and hydroelectric power production
    Guo, ZW
    Xiao, XM
    Li, DM
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2000, 10 (03) : 925 - 936
  • [32] Exploring the effects of management intensification on multiple ecosystem services in an ecosystem management context
    Bas, Emin Zeki
    Kas, Jan
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 518
  • [33] Ecosystem services modeling in contrasting landscapes
    Bojie Fu
    Martin Forsius
    Landscape Ecology, 2015, 30 : 375 - 379
  • [34] Water Regulation Ecosystem Services of Multifunctional Landscape Dominated by Monoculture Plantations
    Kristanto, Yudha
    Tarigan, Suria
    June, Tania
    Wahjunie, Enni Dwi
    Sulistyantara, Bambang
    LAND, 2022, 11 (06)
  • [35] Ecosystem services modeling in contrasting landscapes
    Fu, Bojie
    Forsius, Martin
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2015, 30 (03) : 375 - 379
  • [36] CONSIDERATION OF FOREST ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
    Hajek, Miroslav
    Vrabcova, Pavla
    WOOD RESEARCH, 2020, 65 (01) : 135 - 148
  • [37] ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OF RUSSIA: PROTOTYPE OF THE NATIONAL REPORT, vol 2, BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: PRINCIPLES OF ACCOUNTING IN RUSSIA
    Rozenberg, A. G.
    Rozenberg, G. S.
    ZHURNAL OBSHCHEI BIOLOGII, 2021, 82 (02): : 155 - 160
  • [38] Developing spatial biophysical accounting for multiple ecosystem services
    Remme, Roy P.
    Schroter, Matthias
    Hein, Lars
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 10 : 6 - 18
  • [39] Spatial complementarity of forests and farms: Accounting for ecosystem services
    Pattanayak, SK
    Butry, DT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 87 (04) : 995 - 1008
  • [40] Accurate accounting: How to balance ecosystem services and disservices
    Shapiro, Julie
    Baldi, Andras
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 7 : 201 - 202