Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): using transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) for detecting, visualizing and monitoring the healing process

被引:4
|
作者
Stickelmann, Anna-Lena [1 ]
Kennes, Lieven Nils [2 ]
Holscher, Miriam [1 ]
Graef, Charlotte [1 ]
Kupec, Tomas [1 ]
Wittenborn, Julia [1 ]
Stickeler, Elmar [1 ]
Najjari, Laila [1 ]
机构
[1] Uniklin RWTH Aachen, Gynaecol & Obstet, Aachen, Germany
[2] Hsch Stralsund, Dept Econ & Business Adm, Stralsund, Germany
关键词
Transperineal ultrasound; Obstetric anal sphincter injury; Third-degree perineal tear; Anal sphincter injuries; 3-DIMENSIONAL ULTRASOUND; FECAL INCONTINENCE; TEARS;
D O I
10.1186/s12905-022-01915-7
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose The aim of this study was to examine whether OASIS, and its extent, can be confirmed or excluded using transperineal ultrasound (TPUS). A further objective of this study was to monitor the healing process over a period of 6 months and to establish a connection between the sonographic appearance of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) and anal incontinence. Materials and methods In this retrospective clinical study, women with OASIS who gave birth between March 2014 and August 2019 were enrolled. All the patients underwent TPUS 3 days and 6 months after delivery. A GE E8 Voluson ultrasound system with a 3.5-5 MHz ultrasound probe was used. The ultrasound images showed a third-degree injury, with the measurement of the width of the tear and its extent (superficial, partial, complete, EAS and IAS involvement). A positive contraction effect, a sign of sufficient contraction, was documented. Six months after delivery, a sonographic assessment of the healing (healed, scar or still fully present) was performed. A Wexner score was obtained from each patient. The patients' medical histories, including age, parity, episiotomy and child's weight, were added. Results Thirty-one of the 55 recruited patients were included in the statistical evaluation. Three patients were excluded from the statistical evaluation because OASIS was excluded on TPUS 3 days after delivery. One patient underwent revision surgery for anal incontinence and an inadequately repaired anal sphincter injury, as shown sonographic assessment, 9 days after delivery. Twenty patients were excluded for other reasons. The results suggest that a tear that appears smaller (in mm) after 3 days implies better healing after 6 months. This effect was statistically significant, with a significance level of alpha = 5% (p = 0.0328). Regarding anal incontinence, women who received an episiotomy had fewer anal incontinence symptoms after 6 months. The effect of episiotomy was statistically significant, with a significance level of alpha = 5% (p = 0.0367). Conclusion TPUS is an accessible, non-invasive method for detecting, quantifying, following-up and monitoring OASIS in patients with third-degree perineal tears. The width, as obtained by sonography, is important with regard to the healing of OASIS. A mediolateral episiotomy seems to prevent anal incontinence after 6 months.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [21] Early secondary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs): experience and a review of the literature
    Nicola Adanna Okeahialam
    Ranee Thakar
    Abdul H. Sultan
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2021, 32 : 1611 - 1622
  • [22] Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury with fundal pressure in second stage of labor: Transperineal ultrasound study
    Oncu, Hande N.
    Aydin, Serdar
    Arioglu, Cagri
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2021, 40 (05) : 1192 - 1199
  • [23] 2D-transperineal ultrasound in delivery room: Contribution in assessing labor progress, predicting outcome of labor and recognizing obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). A systematic review
    Nebel, Siegfried
    Vardon, Delphine
    Dreyfus, Michel
    Pizzoferrato, Anne-Cecile
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2025, 54 (03)
  • [24] Use of endoanal ultrasound in detecting obstetric anal sphincter injury immediately after birth
    Huber, Malin
    Larsson, Charlotta
    Harrysson, Mathilda
    Strigard, Karin
    Lehmann, Jan-P.
    Nordin, Par
    Tunon, Katarina
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2023, 102 (03) : 389 - 395
  • [25] Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of 3 ultrasound modalities for diagnosing obstetric anal sphincter injuries
    Taithongchai, Annika
    van Gruting, Isabelle M. A.
    Volloyhaug, Ingrid
    Arendsen, Linda P.
    Sultan, Abdul H.
    Thakar, Ranee
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 221 (02) : 134.e1 - 134.e9
  • [26] Management of subsequent pregnancies following fourth-degree obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)
    Taithongchai, Annika
    Thakar, Ranee
    Sultan, Abdul H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 250 : 80 - 85
  • [27] The management of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): A national postal questionnaire survey in hospitals in the UK
    Ismail, S. I. M. F.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 35 (03) : 229 - 234
  • [28] Outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): does the grade of tear matter?
    Roos, A. -M.
    Thakar, R.
    Sultan, A. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 36 (03) : 368 - 374
  • [29] Evaluation of French practices in the management and the follow-up of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)
    Bassi, Romane
    Ramanah, Rajeev
    Mottet, Nicolas
    Lallemant, Marine
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2025, 54 (03)
  • [30] Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) incidence. Twenty-five years' evolution
    Camprubi, E. Alberch
    Costa, M. Mestre
    Pueyo, J. Costa
    Soler, J. Pubill
    CLINICA E INVESTIGACION EN GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2025, 52 (01):