Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): using transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) for detecting, visualizing and monitoring the healing process

被引:4
|
作者
Stickelmann, Anna-Lena [1 ]
Kennes, Lieven Nils [2 ]
Holscher, Miriam [1 ]
Graef, Charlotte [1 ]
Kupec, Tomas [1 ]
Wittenborn, Julia [1 ]
Stickeler, Elmar [1 ]
Najjari, Laila [1 ]
机构
[1] Uniklin RWTH Aachen, Gynaecol & Obstet, Aachen, Germany
[2] Hsch Stralsund, Dept Econ & Business Adm, Stralsund, Germany
关键词
Transperineal ultrasound; Obstetric anal sphincter injury; Third-degree perineal tear; Anal sphincter injuries; 3-DIMENSIONAL ULTRASOUND; FECAL INCONTINENCE; TEARS;
D O I
10.1186/s12905-022-01915-7
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose The aim of this study was to examine whether OASIS, and its extent, can be confirmed or excluded using transperineal ultrasound (TPUS). A further objective of this study was to monitor the healing process over a period of 6 months and to establish a connection between the sonographic appearance of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) and anal incontinence. Materials and methods In this retrospective clinical study, women with OASIS who gave birth between March 2014 and August 2019 were enrolled. All the patients underwent TPUS 3 days and 6 months after delivery. A GE E8 Voluson ultrasound system with a 3.5-5 MHz ultrasound probe was used. The ultrasound images showed a third-degree injury, with the measurement of the width of the tear and its extent (superficial, partial, complete, EAS and IAS involvement). A positive contraction effect, a sign of sufficient contraction, was documented. Six months after delivery, a sonographic assessment of the healing (healed, scar or still fully present) was performed. A Wexner score was obtained from each patient. The patients' medical histories, including age, parity, episiotomy and child's weight, were added. Results Thirty-one of the 55 recruited patients were included in the statistical evaluation. Three patients were excluded from the statistical evaluation because OASIS was excluded on TPUS 3 days after delivery. One patient underwent revision surgery for anal incontinence and an inadequately repaired anal sphincter injury, as shown sonographic assessment, 9 days after delivery. Twenty patients were excluded for other reasons. The results suggest that a tear that appears smaller (in mm) after 3 days implies better healing after 6 months. This effect was statistically significant, with a significance level of alpha = 5% (p = 0.0328). Regarding anal incontinence, women who received an episiotomy had fewer anal incontinence symptoms after 6 months. The effect of episiotomy was statistically significant, with a significance level of alpha = 5% (p = 0.0367). Conclusion TPUS is an accessible, non-invasive method for detecting, quantifying, following-up and monitoring OASIS in patients with third-degree perineal tears. The width, as obtained by sonography, is important with regard to the healing of OASIS. A mediolateral episiotomy seems to prevent anal incontinence after 6 months.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): using transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) for detecting, visualizing and monitoring the healing process
    Anna-Lena Stickelmann
    Lieven Nils Kennes
    Miriam Hölscher
    Charlotte Graef
    Tomas Kupec
    Julia Wittenborn
    Elmar Stickeler
    Laila Najjari
    BMC Women's Health, 22
  • [2] Diagnostic capabilities of transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) to evaluate anal sphincter defect post obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS)? A systematic review
    Hakim, Surahman
    Santoso, Budi Iman
    Djusad, Suskhan
    Moegni, Fernandi
    Surya, Raymond
    Kurniawan, Andrew Pratama
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND, 2023, 26 (02) : 393 - 399
  • [3] Comparison of transperineal and endoanal ultrasound in detecting residual obstetric anal sphincter injury
    Stuart, Andrea
    Ignell, Claes
    Orno, Ann-Kristin
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (12) : 1624 - 1631
  • [4] Can transperineal ultrasound improve the diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries?
    Wong, Ka Woon
    Thakar, Ranee
    Sultan, Abdul H.
    Andrews, Vasanth
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (10) : 2809 - 2814
  • [5] Transperineal anal sphincter complex evaluation after obstetric anal sphincter injuries: With or without tomographic ultrasound imaging technique?
    Franco, Eva Martinez
    Ros, Cristina
    Santoro, Giulio Aniello
    Garriga, Jordi Cassado
    Tardiu, Lluis Amat
    Cuadras, Daniel
    Espuna, Montserrat
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 257 : 70 - 75
  • [6] Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS)
    Basham, Elizabeth
    Stock, Laura
    Lewicky-Gaupp, Christina
    Mitchell, Christopher
    Gossett, Dana R.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 19 (06): : 328 - 332
  • [7] Transperineal ultrasound assessment of the anal sphincter after obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI)
    Eisenberg, V. H.
    Valsky, D. V.
    Yagel, S.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 53 (02) : 158 - 165
  • [8] Correlations of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) grade, specific symptoms of anal incontinence, and measurements by endoanal and transperineal ultrasound
    Claes Ignell
    Ann-Kristin Örnö
    Andrea Stuart
    Journal of Ultrasound, 2021, 24 : 261 - 267
  • [9] Correlations of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) grade, specific symptoms of anal incontinence, and measurements by endoanal and transperineal ultrasound
    Ignell, Claes
    Orno, Ann-Kristin
    Stuart, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND, 2021, 24 (03) : 261 - 267
  • [10] Assessing Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries A Comparison of Exoanal and Endoanal Ultrasound
    Zhao, Baihua
    Li, Yinbo
    Tang, Yingchun
    Guo, Yuyang
    Yang, Yalin
    Wen, Lieming
    Dietz, Hans Peter
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (09) : 2031 - 2038