The Discrepancy between Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score in Patients with Prostate Cancer

被引:8
作者
Abedi, Amir Reza [1 ]
Basiri, Abbas [2 ]
Shakhssalim, Nasser [2 ]
Sadri, Ghazal [3 ]
Ahadi, Mahsa [4 ]
Hojjati, Seyyed Ali [1 ]
Sheykhzadeh, Samad [5 ]
Askarpour, Sajjad [2 ]
Ghiasy, Saleh [1 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Shohadae Tajrish Hosp, Dept Urol, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Shahid Labbafinejad Med Ctr, Urol & Nephrol Res Ctr, Dept Urol, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Tehran, Iran
[4] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Shohadae Tajrish Hosp, Dept Pathol, Tehran, Iran
[5] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Shahid Modares Hosp, Dept Urol, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Gleason score; needle biopsy; prostate cancer; PSA; radical prostatectomy; HIGH-GRADE; RISK; INTERMEDIATE; SPECIMENS; ACCURACY; NOMOGRAM; SIZE;
D O I
10.22037/uj.v16i7.5985
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Gleason score (GS), as well as other prognostic and diagnostic modalities, can predict the possibility of tumor growth and metastasis during the life of patients with prostate cancer. Based on the prostate biopsy GS, clinicians choose the most appropriate therapy for managing patients. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to determine the discrepancy between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy GS and to identify its predictive factors in the Iranian population. Materials and Methods: A total of 1147 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from 2009 to 2019 were initially enrolled in this study. After consideration of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 439 patients were finally included. The demographic variables and clinical data including age, PSA level, prostate volume, PSA density, GS derived from ultrasonography-guided core needle biopsy specimen, and GS derived from radical prostatectomy specimen were collected from the medical records of patients with prostate adenocarcinoma and were reviewed by a urology resident. Results: The average age of patients was 64.5 years (range 48-84 years), and the average preoperative PSA level was 14.8 ng/mL. On histopathological examination, no changes in GS were observed in 237 (53.9%) patients, whereas GS was upgraded in 144 (32.8%) patients and downgraded in 58 (13.2%) patients at radical prostatectomy. The number of patients who had extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and positive lymph nodes was significantly higher in the upgraded group compared with the non-upgraded group. Conclusion: In this study, there was a steady decrease in GS upgrading with the prostate size extending up to 49.7 g. There was also an association between downgrading and extending prostate size. Due to the greater risk of high-grade disease in men with small prostates, smaller prostate bulks are most probably upgraded after radical prostatectomy. A higher maximum percentage of involvement per core was an independent predictive factor of upgrading from biopsy grade 1 to grade >= 2. Our study showed that patients' age was not predictive of upgrading, which is consistent with other studies. Also, we demonstrated a non-significant relationship between PSA level and upgraded GS. Findings in this study did not demonstrate a significant relationship between PSA level and upgrading.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 399
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The impact of biopsy core length on the discrepancy in Gleason scores between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen
    Guo, Cheng-hao
    Geng, Yin-shuai
    Zhu, Liang-yong
    Ding, Xue-fei
    Luan, Yang
    BJUI COMPASS, 2025, 6 (03):
  • [22] Concordance between Gleason score of prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens and its predictive factors
    Ariafar, Ali
    Rezaeian, Ali
    Zare, Ali
    Zeighami, Shahryar
    Hosseini, Seyed Hossein
    Nikbakht, Hossein-Ali
    Narouie, Behzad
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2023, 90 (02) : 236 - 243
  • [23] How significant is upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology while discussing less invasive treatment options?
    Suer, Evren
    Gokce, Mehmet Ilker
    Gulpinar, Omer
    Guclu, Adil Gucal
    Haciyev, Perviz
    Gogus, Cagatay
    Turkolmez, Kadir
    Baltaci, Sumer
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 48 (02) : 177 - 182
  • [24] The prognostic impact of downgrading and upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy among men with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer
    Jang, Won Sik
    Koh, Dong Hoon
    Kim, Jongchan
    Lee, Jong Soo
    Chung, Doo Yong
    Ham, Won Sik
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Choi, Young Deuk
    PROSTATE, 2019, 79 (16) : 1805 - 1810
  • [25] Impact of Gleason pattern up gradation after radical prostatectomy for carcinoma prostate patients with low biopsy score (≤ 6)
    Kulkarni, Jagdeesh N.
    Valsangkar, Rohan S.
    Jadhav, Yogesh R.
    Singh, Dayal Partap
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 7 (04) : 459 - 462
  • [26] Comparing histology between prostate cognitive fusion targeted biopsy and radical prostatectomy: exploring risk factors of Gleason score upgrading in Chinese patients
    Zheng, Tianyun
    Sun, Huaibin
    Tang, Yueqing
    Bi, Kaipeng
    Zeng, Yuan
    Wang, Junyan
    Yan, Lei
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 149 (20) : 18023 - 18027
  • [27] Comparison between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy samples in assessing Gleason score and modified Gleason score in prostatic adenocarcinomas
    Dogan Gun, Banu
    Bektas, Sibel
    Bahadir, Burak
    Mungan, Aydin
    Ozdamar, Sukru Oguz
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2007, 23 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [28] Does extended prostate needle biopsy improve the concordance of Gleason scores between biopsy and prostatectomy in the Taiwanese population?
    Yang, Ching-Wei
    Lin, Tzu-Ping
    Huang, Yi-Hsiu
    Chung, Hsiao-Jen
    Kuo, Junne-Yih
    Huang, William J. S.
    Wu, Howard H. H.
    Chang, Yen-Hwa
    Lin, Alex T. L.
    Chen, Kuang-Kuo
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 75 (03) : 97 - 101
  • [29] Concordance Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimen Gleason Score in Internal and External Pathology Facilities
    Grasso, Angelica A. C.
    Cozzi, Gabriele
    Palumbo, Carlotta
    Albo, Giancarlo
    Rocco, Bernardo
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (10) : 5585 - 5588
  • [30] The Ability of Prostate Health Index (PHI) to Predict Gleason Score in Patients With Prostate Cancer and Discriminate Patients Between Gleason Score 6 and Gleason Score Higher Than 6-A Study on 320 Patients After Radical Prostatectomy
    Dolejsova, Olga
    Kucera, Radek
    Fuchsova, Radka
    Topolcan, Ondrej
    Svobodova, Hana
    Hes, Ondrej
    Eret, Viktor
    Pecen, Ladislav
    Hora, Milan
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2018, 17 : 1 - 6